Skip to main content
Loading...
survey

Monthly Belonging Pulse Survey

A monthly employee survey measuring belonging, inclusion, team connection, psychological safety, manager support, and intent to stay with actionable open feedback.

Every employee gets a seat — priced per employee in Communications & Intranet, quoted with this template ready.

Rolled out to every employee at AutoZone (125,000), PetSmart (50,000+), A.S. Watson and Raley's (20,000) — and at larger retailers we are not permitted to name.

Built for: Technology And Software · Healthcare Organizations · Professional Services · Higher Education · Financial Services

Overview

The Monthly Belonging Pulse Survey is a reusable employee survey for tracking whether people feel accepted, respected, connected, and safe speaking up at work. It covers four focused sections: Belonging and Inclusion, Team Connection and Psychological Safety, Manager Support and Intent to Stay, and Open Feedback. The rating statements use agreement-based questions that can be monitored month over month, while the lowest-rating prompts help explain the engagement drivers behind the scores.

Use this template when HR, people leaders, or an executive sponsor needs a recurring signal on inclusion and team experience without running a full annual engagement survey. It is particularly useful during hybrid work, restructuring, rapid growth, manager changes, or efforts to improve retention. Keep the anonymity guarantee visible and report results only at a level that protects respondents.

This is a pulse survey, not a replacement for a detailed Gallup Q12-style annual engagement assessment, a formal investigation, or an exit survey. It does not include an eNPS item on the 0-10 promoter, passive, and detractor scale; add that separately if recommendation sentiment is a specific decision need. Do not use monthly results to evaluate individual managers from very small teams, identify respondents, or make employment decisions without appropriate context.

Standards & compliance context

  • Use anonymous or strongly de-identified reporting for questions about identity, inclusion, psychological safety, managers, and intent to stay, with access restricted to authorized people teams.
  • For employees covered by GDPR or similar privacy laws, define the survey purpose, minimize collected data, document retention limits, and provide transparent notice about processing.
  • Do not expose comments or subgroup results when the audience is small enough that respondents could reasonably be inferred.
  • Treat survey feedback as an engagement signal rather than evidence for disciplinary or employment decisions, and route allegations of harassment or discrimination through the appropriate confidential process.

General regulatory context for orientation only — verify current requirements with counsel or the relevant agency before relying on this template for compliance.

What's inside this template

Belonging and Inclusion

This section measures whether employees feel accepted, respected, and able to bring important aspects of themselves to work, then asks what drives their lowest rating.

  • I feel that I belong at this organization. (required)

    5-point scale: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree.

  • People at this organization value and respect different perspectives and backgrounds. (required)

    5-point scale: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree.

  • I can be myself at work without feeling pressure to hide important aspects of who I am. (required)

    5-point scale: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree.

  • What is the primary reason for your lowest rating in this section?

    Optional. Please share context if any item above was rated Disagree or Strongly disagree.

Team Connection and Psychological Safety

This section shows whether employees feel connected to colleagues and safe raising questions, concerns, or different opinions.

  • I feel connected to the people I work with regularly. (required)

    5-point scale: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree.

  • People on my team support one another when work is challenging. (required)

    5-point scale: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree.

  • I feel safe speaking up with questions, concerns, or different opinions on my team. (required)

    5-point scale: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree.

  • What would most improve connection or psychological safety on your team?

    Optional. Please share context if any item above was rated Disagree or Strongly disagree.

Manager Support and Intent to Stay

This section links manager effectiveness and access to information with employees’ intent to remain at the organization.

  • My manager helps create an inclusive and respectful team environment. (required)

    5-point scale: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree.

  • I receive the support and information I need from my manager to do my work effectively. (required)

    5-point scale: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree.

  • I intend to still be working at this organization 12 months from now. (required)

    5-point scale: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree.

  • What is the primary reason for your lowest rating in this section?

    Optional. Please share context if any item above was rated Disagree or Strongly disagree.

Open Feedback

This section turns the monthly score into an actionable suggestion and gives employees space to share anything the structured questions missed.

  • What is one thing we could do this month to strengthen belonging, inclusion, or team connection?
  • Is there anything else you would like us to know about your employee experience?

How to use this template

  1. Review the four sections, confirm the 5-point response scale uses clear anchors from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, and customize only the wording and engagement drivers relevant to your organization.
  2. Configure the survey as anonymous, add the anonymity guarantee and reporting threshold to the introduction, and place any optional demographic questions after the content questions.
  3. Send the survey to the intended employee population with a clear closing date, a short explanation of how results will be used, and a reminder that honest feedback is welcome.
  4. Close responses, check the response rate and item distributions, and compare belonging, connection, psychological safety, manager support, and intent-to-stay trends with prior months.
  5. Code recurring open-text themes and review the follow-ups attached to low ratings without attempting to identify individual respondents from writing style or small-group context.
  6. Share the main findings and one or two owned actions with employees, then check progress and repeat the measurement at the next agreed monthly cadence.

Best practices

  • Keep the monthly pulse to these focused sections or a similarly short structure so the cadence does not create avoidable survey fatigue.
  • Use a 5-point Likert scale with semantic anchors from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree rather than raw numbers or an 11-point scale.
  • Preserve the open follow-ups for low ratings so detractor feedback explains why a belonging, safety, or manager-support score is weak.
  • State the anonymity guarantee, minimum reporting group size, data access rules, and intended use before employees begin the survey.
  • Review response rate alongside scores because a stable average can hide disengagement when the people responding change from month to month.
  • Treat demographic questions as optional and place them last to reduce collection bias and avoid signaling that anonymity is illusory.
  • Avoid leading wording, such as asking whether a manager is great, and keep every statement neutral enough for disagreement to be meaningful.
  • Close the feedback loop by communicating what will change, what will not change, and when employees will hear an update.

What this template typically catches

Issues teams running this template most often surface in practice:

Employees report belonging but explain low scores through exclusion from decisions, meetings, or informal communication.
Low psychological-safety ratings are tied to fear of negative reactions when raising concerns or challenging established opinions.
Manager-support scores fall when employees lack timely information, context, recognition, or consistent one-to-one conversations.
Intent-to-stay declines alongside comments about limited growth, workload, unclear priorities, or weak inclusion practices.
Response rates drop when employees cannot see visible action from earlier pulses or when reminders become too frequent.
Open-text responses reveal that a broad average conceals different experiences across teams, locations, job levels, or employment arrangements.
Leading or ambiguous wording produces agreement without clarifying which engagement driver needs attention.
Collecting demographic information too early or reporting small subgroups creates a perception that the anonymity guarantee is not credible.

Common use cases

People team at a distributed software company
Use the monthly pulse to compare belonging and team connection across remote locations without exposing individual responses. Pair recurring low ratings with manager listening sessions and a visible action register.
HR business partner during restructuring
Run the survey before and after a reorganization to monitor inclusion, psychological safety, manager support, and intent to stay. Explain the purpose clearly so employees understand how sensitive feedback will be protected.
Healthcare organization monitoring team strain
Use the connection and manager-support sections during periods of staffing or workflow change. Route comments describing safety, discrimination, or patient-care risks through the appropriate confidential channels rather than treating them as ordinary pulse themes.
Higher-education department improving inclusion
Track whether employees feel respected and able to be themselves across academic and administrative teams. Keep demographic items optional and last, and suppress small subgroup results.
Professional-services leadership reviewing retention risk
Use intent to stay alongside manager support and open feedback to identify where client workload, communication, or career clarity may affect retention. Add a separate eNPS question only if recommendation sentiment is needed.

Frequently asked questions

What does this belonging pulse survey measure?

It measures belonging and inclusion, team connection, psychological safety, manager support, and intent to stay. Each section uses clear agreement statements and includes an open follow-up to explain a low rating. The final section captures one practical improvement suggestion and any additional employee feedback.

How often should we send this survey?

This template is designed for a monthly pulse cadence, which gives leaders a regular view of engagement drivers without the length of an annual engagement survey. Review response rates and repeated comments for signs of survey fatigue. If participation declines, consider rotating a smaller set of questions or moving to a quarterly cadence.

Who should run and review the survey?

People or HR teams typically configure and distribute the survey, while managers and executive sponsors review aggregated themes. Managers should receive team-level findings only when group size and anonymity rules make it safe to report them. Assign an owner to communicate actions and monitor whether commitments are addressed in the next pulse.

Should responses be anonymous?

Anonymity should be the default for this employee survey, especially because it asks about inclusion, identity, psychological safety, managers, and intent to stay. Clearly state the anonymity guarantee, minimum reporting thresholds, and who can access raw responses before launch. Follow applicable privacy requirements, including data minimization and purpose limitation under GDPR where relevant.

Can we customize the questions for our organization?

Yes, you can adapt wording, add organization-specific engagement drivers, or include a short demographic section at the end when there is a clear analytical purpose. Keep the pulse to one or two sections when adding questions so monthly completion remains manageable. Preserve the 5-point Likert format and retain open follow-ups for ratings at or below 3.

How is this better than asking employees for informal feedback?

The template creates a repeatable baseline using consistent 5-point Likert questions, so changes in belonging, connection, manager effectiveness, and intent to stay can be tracked over time. Its open-ended prompts explain why employees choose lower ratings, which informal comments may not capture consistently. Use conversations and focus groups as follow-up methods rather than substitutes for the recurring pulse.

Can the results connect to our people analytics workflow?

Export or connect responses to the people analytics, reporting, or HR workflow your organization already uses, subject to its privacy controls. Track item trends, response rate, promoter, passive, and detractor patterns where an eNPS question is added separately. Avoid combining small groups or exposing comments in a way that could identify respondents.

What should we do after the survey closes?

Review response rate, item-level distributions, lowest-rated drivers, and recurring themes in the open responses. Share a concise summary with employees, distinguish findings from interpretations, and commit to one or two actions with named owners. Revisit those actions in the next monthly pulse rather than launching another survey without visible follow-through.

Go deeper on the topic

Related concepts
  • Benchmarking is the practice of comparing an organization's metrics — compensation, engagement, turnover, time-to-hire, training hours, span of control, any...
  • Communication at work is the practice of moving information reliably — announcements, decisions, expectations, problems — between the people who have it and...
  • A communications cascade is the pattern where corporate leadership sends a message to the next management layer, which rebriefs the layer below it, and so on...
  • Corporate communications is the broad function that owns how the company communicates — to employees, investors, customers, regulators, and the press....

Ready to use this template?

Every employee gets a seat. Request pricing for Communications & Intranet and we quote into a workspace with Monthly Belonging Pulse Survey ready.

Request pricing

Rolled out to every employee at AutoZone (125,000), PetSmart (50,000+), A.S. Watson and Raley's (20,000) — and at larger retailers we are not permitted to name.