Onboarding Buddy Feedback Survey
An onboarding buddy feedback survey for new hires to rate reachability, guidance, belonging, and program clarity, then explain what helped or got in the way.
Trusted by frontline teams 15 years of frontline software
Built for: Technology · Healthcare · Professional Services · Retail · Manufacturing
Overview
This onboarding buddy feedback survey is designed to evaluate the peer-support part of onboarding, not onboarding in general. It asks new hires to rate whether their buddy was easy to reach, helped them learn how to get things done, made them feel welcome, and improved their confidence and sense of belonging.
Use this template when your organization assigns a buddy, mentor, or onboarding peer and you want to know whether that relationship is actually working. It is especially useful after the first few weeks or at the end of a 30/60/90-day onboarding cycle, when the new hire has enough experience to judge the quality of support. The survey also checks whether expectations were clear and whether the amount of contact felt right, which helps you separate a weak buddy match from a weak program design.
Do not use this template as a replacement for a full onboarding survey if you need feedback on compensation, training, equipment, manager effectiveness, or policy clarity. It is also not the right tool if the buddy relationship has not really started yet. The open-ended follow-ups matter: low ratings should trigger a question about what got in the way, and the final comment field captures anything else that would help improve the program. That makes the survey useful for cohort-by-cohort review and for identifying the few changes that will improve future new-hire experiences.
Standards & compliance context
- Anonymity should be the default for employee surveys unless there is a documented reason to identify respondents.
- If you collect demographic data, keep it optional and last to reduce collection-bias risk and preserve trust.
- Avoid leading or evaluative wording that pressures new hires to praise the buddy relationship instead of reporting their real experience.
- If the survey is used in regulated environments, retain responses according to your internal HR data-retention and privacy policies.
General regulatory context for orientation only — verify current requirements with counsel or the relevant agency before relying on this template for compliance.
What's inside this template
Buddy Experience
This section checks whether the buddy was accessible, helpful, and welcoming in the day-to-day moments that shape a new hire's first impression.
-
My buddy was easy to reach when I had questions.
Strongly disagree / Disagree / Neither agree nor disagree / Agree / Strongly agree
-
My buddy helped me understand how to get things done in my role and team.
Strongly disagree / Disagree / Neither agree nor disagree / Agree / Strongly agree
-
My buddy made me feel welcome and supported.
Strongly disagree / Disagree / Neither agree nor disagree / Agree / Strongly agree
- What did your buddy do that was most helpful?
Integration and Confidence
This section measures whether the buddy relationship actually helped the new hire navigate the team, tools, and processes with more confidence and belonging.
-
The buddy relationship helped me integrate into the team.
Strongly disagree / Disagree / Neither agree nor disagree / Agree / Strongly agree
-
I feel more confident navigating people, tools, and processes because of my buddy.
Strongly disagree / Disagree / Neither agree nor disagree / Agree / Strongly agree
-
My buddy helped me feel a sense of belonging.
Strongly disagree / Disagree / Neither agree nor disagree / Agree / Strongly agree
- If any of the ratings above were low, what got in the way of a better buddy experience?
Program Improvement
This section identifies whether the buddy program itself was clear, appropriately paced, and ready for practical changes.
-
The buddy program expectations were clear.
Strongly disagree / Disagree / Neither agree nor disagree / Agree / Strongly agree
-
The amount of contact with my buddy was about right.
Too little / Slightly too little / About right / Slightly too much / Too much
- What should we change to improve the buddy program for future new hires?
Overall Feedback
This section captures anything the structured questions missed so you can catch edge cases and improvement ideas in the respondent's own words.
- Anything else you'd like to share about your onboarding buddy experience?
How to use this template
- 1. Set the survey to anonymous by default and schedule it after the new hire has had enough time to interact with the buddy, such as at 30, 60, or 90 days.
- 2. Keep the core questions intact, using the rating items to measure reachability, practical help, welcome, integration, confidence, belonging, expectations, and contact cadence.
- 3. Make sure the open-ended follow-up appears after any low rating so respondents can explain what got in the way of a better buddy experience.
- 4. Review results by cohort, role, location, or buddy pair to see whether the issue is individual matching, unclear expectations, or a program-wide process gap.
- 5. Turn the findings into specific changes, such as buddy training, a clearer checklist, better kickoff instructions, or a different contact cadence for future new hires.
Best practices
- Use 5-point Likert scales with clear anchors such as Strongly disagree to Strongly agree so respondents can answer quickly and consistently.
- Attach an open-ended follow-up to low ratings so you learn why the buddy experience fell short instead of guessing from the score alone.
- Keep demographics optional and place them last if you collect them at all, because early demographic questions can reduce trust and response quality.
- Review the survey by cohort rather than only in aggregate so you can spot whether a specific onboarding class or team had a different experience.
- Treat 'amount of contact' as a design question, not a performance judgment, because some roles need more frequent buddy touchpoints than others.
- Use the final 'Anything else?' question to catch issues that do not fit the structured items, such as scheduling friction or mismatched expectations.
- Train buddies to give practical, role-specific help, because vague encouragement does not usually improve confidence or day-to-day navigation.
What this template typically catches
Issues teams running this template most often surface in practice:
Common use cases
Frequently asked questions
Who should use an onboarding buddy feedback survey?
Use it with new hires who were assigned an onboarding buddy during their first weeks or months. It is especially useful for HR, People Ops, and managers who want to evaluate whether the buddy program is actually helping people integrate. If you do not have a formal buddy program, this template can still work as a lightweight check on informal peer support.
When should this survey be sent?
Send it after the new hire has had enough time to interact with the buddy meaningfully, often near the end of the first 30, 60, or 90 days. The right cadence depends on how active the buddy relationship is and how long onboarding lasts. If the survey is sent too early, you will measure first impressions instead of real support.
What does this template measure that a general onboarding survey does not?
This template focuses specifically on the buddy relationship: reachability, practical help, confidence, belonging, and whether expectations were clear. That makes it better for diagnosing problems in the buddy program itself rather than onboarding overall. It also includes follow-up prompts that help you understand why a rating was low.
Should the survey be anonymous?
Yes, anonymity should be the default for employee feedback unless there is a clear reason to identify respondents. New hires are more likely to give honest feedback about a buddy relationship when they trust their answers will not be tied back to them. If you need identifiable responses for follow-up, make that choice explicit and separate it from the survey content.
What are the most common mistakes when using this survey?
A common mistake is asking only whether the buddy was 'good' without separating practical support, belonging, and clarity of expectations. Another is skipping open-ended follow-ups on low ratings, which leaves you with scores but no explanation. It is also a mistake to collect demographic questions before the survey content, because that can reduce trust and response quality.
How can this survey be customized for different roles or teams?
You can tailor the wording to match the new hire's context, such as engineering, sales, operations, or remote onboarding. Keep the core questions about reachability, guidance, and integration, but adjust the examples of 'people, tools, and processes' to fit the role. If your buddy program has a formal checklist, you can add one question about whether that checklist was followed.
Can this survey be used alongside other onboarding surveys or tools?
Yes, it works well as a focused module within a broader onboarding survey program. It can be paired with onboarding check-ins, manager feedback, or HRIS workflows that trigger surveys at set milestones. Keep the buddy survey short so it does not compete with other onboarding feedback requests.
How do we use the results to improve the program?
Look for patterns in the ratings and the open-ended comments, especially where new hires say the buddy was hard to reach, expectations were unclear, or contact was too little or too much. Those findings usually point to fixes in buddy selection, training, cadence, or manager oversight. The goal is to change the program design, not just collect sentiment.
Related templates
Go deeper on the topic
-
Benchmarking is the practice of comparing an organization's metrics — compensation, engagement, turnover, time-to-hire, training hours, span of control, any...
-
Communication at work is the practice of moving information reliably — announcements, decisions, expectations, problems — between the people who have it and...
-
A communications cascade is the pattern where corporate leadership sends a message to the next management layer, which rebriefs the layer below it, and so on...
-
Corporate communications is the broad function that owns how the company communicates — to employees, investors, customers, regulators, and the press....
-
Healthcare employee engagement ideas to reduce burnout, boost retention, and improve patient outcomes in your health system.
-
Learn how to improve retail execution with smarter task management, real-time monitoring, and frontline communication tools that drive store-level results.
-
Boost healthcare employee engagement with proven ideas that reduce burnout, improve retention, and elevate patient care.
-
Discover how a mobile-first employee app transforms retail staff training—streamlining onboarding, standardizing SOPs, and reaching every frontline worker.
Ready to use this template?
Get started with MangoApps and use Onboarding Buddy Feedback Survey with your team — pricing built for small business.