Loading...
quality

Layered PPAP Submission Audit

Verify every Level 3 PPAP element against AIAG requirements before submission. Catch missing evidence, mismatched revisions, and control-plan gaps early to reduce rework and approval delays.

Trusted by frontline teams 15 years of frontline software AI customization in seconds

Built for: Automotive ยท Manufacturing ยท Aerospace ยท Industrial Equipment

What's inside this template

Submission Scope and Administrative Review

  • PPAP submission level is confirmed as Level 3 (critical ยท weight 3.0)
  • Part number, part name, and revision level match the approved request (critical ยท weight 3.0)
  • Submission package includes a complete index or element checklist (weight 2.0)
  • Customer-specific requirements have been identified and included (critical ยท weight 3.0)
  • Submission date and responsible approver are documented (weight 2.0)

Design and Engineering Documentation

  • Design records are current and match the released part revision (critical ยท weight 5.0)
  • Authorized engineering change documents are included, if applicable (weight 4.0)
  • Customer engineering approval evidence is included where required (weight 4.0)
  • Design FMEA is available and aligned to the current design (critical ยท weight 4.0)
  • Special characteristics are identified consistently across design documents (weight 3.0)

Process Definition and Risk Controls

  • Process flow diagram is included and matches the actual manufacturing sequence (critical ยท weight 4.0)
  • Process FMEA is complete, current, and linked to the process flow (critical ยท weight 5.0)
  • Control plan is included and aligned to the PFMEA and process flow (critical ยท weight 5.0)
  • Special characteristics and reaction plans are clearly defined in the control plan (weight 3.0)
  • Gage, fixture, and checking aid requirements are identified for key characteristics (weight 3.0)

Measurement, Dimensional, and Capability Evidence

  • Dimensional results are complete for all drawing characteristics (critical ยท weight 6.0)
  • Measurement system analysis (MSA) or gage R&R is included for applicable measurements (critical ยท weight 5.0)
  • Initial process study or capability evidence meets required thresholds (critical ยท weight 6.0)
  • Capability studies identify the correct characteristic, sample size, and method used (weight 4.0)
  • Out-of-specification results are documented with disposition and containment (weight 4.0)

Material, Test, and Supplier Evidence

  • Material test results or certificates of analysis are included as required (critical ยท weight 4.0)
  • Performance test results are included and meet specification requirements (critical ยท weight 4.0)
  • Qualified laboratory documentation is available for external testing, if applicable (weight 3.0)
  • Appearance approval documentation is included when the part has appearance requirements (weight 2.0)
  • Records of compliance to customer or regulatory requirements are included (weight 2.0)

Submission Package Closure

  • Sample parts are identified and retained per submission requirements (weight 1.0)
  • Master sample is identified and controlled, if required (weight 1.0)
  • Checking aids are identified, calibrated, or otherwise controlled as required (weight 1.0)
  • Part Submission Warrant (PSW) is complete and ready for approval (critical ยท weight 1.0)
  • All 18 PPAP elements have been reviewed for completeness (critical ยท weight 1.0)

Common use cases

Supplier PPAP submission review
Customer PPAP package approval
New part launch quality gate
Revision-controlled engineering change audit
Manufacturing process readiness check

Frequently asked questions

What does this template help me verify?

It checks a Level 3 PPAP submission against the required AIAG elements, including design records, PFMEA, control plan, dimensional results, and PSW closure. Use it to confirm the package is complete before sending it to a customer.

Is this template only for Level 3 PPAPs?

It is built around Level 3 submissions, which are the most common full-package review. You can adapt it for other submission levels by removing or adding evidence requirements as needed.

Can I use this for supplier PPAP reviews?

Yes. Quality teams can use it to audit supplier submissions and confirm the package matches the approved part, revision, and customer-specific requirements. It also helps standardize review comments and follow-up actions.

Does it cover special characteristics and capability evidence?

Yes. The template includes checks for special characteristics across design, PFMEA, and control plan documents, plus capability, MSA, and dimensional evidence where applicable. That helps ensure the process controls match the risk profile of the part.

What should I do if an element is missing or incomplete?

Record the gap, note the required correction, and assign ownership before approving the submission. This makes it easier to track open items and prevent an incomplete PPAP from moving forward.

Related templates

Ready to use this template?

Get started with MangoApps and use Layered PPAP Submission Audit with your team โ€” pricing built for small business.

Ask AI Product Advisor

Hi! I'm the MangoApps Product Advisor. I can help you with:

  • Understanding our 40+ workplace apps
  • Finding the right solution for your needs
  • Answering questions about pricing and features
  • Pointing you to free tools you can try right now

What would you like to know?