Loading...
education

Extended School Year (ESY) Eligibility Determination Form

An Extended School Year (ESY) Eligibility Determination Form for documenting the team’s decision, the basis for eligibility, and the proposed service plan for a student with an IEP.

Trusted by frontline teams 15 years of frontline software AI customization in seconds

Built for: K 12 Public Schools · Special Education · Charter Schools · School Districts

Overview

This form documents an IEP team’s Extended School Year decision and the service plan that follows. It is built for the point in the process where the team has reviewed student data, discussed whether ESY is needed, and needs a clear record of the outcome, the reasoning behind it, and the planned services.

Use it when you want a consistent record for students with IEPs who may need services beyond the regular school year. The form captures the submission purpose, consent acknowledgment, and parent or guardian notification, then moves into student and IEP identification, eligibility determination, and the ESY service plan. That structure helps the team keep the decision tied to the correct student and the correct IEP review date.

Do not use this form as a general meeting agenda or as a substitute for the IEP itself. It is not meant for students without an IEP, and it should not be used when the team has not yet reviewed the relevant data. If the district needs a separate notice of action, meeting minutes, or transportation request, those can be handled in linked documents. The form works best when the team needs a concise, auditable record of what was decided, why it was decided, and what services will be delivered next.

Standards & compliance context

  • The form supports documentation of an IEP team decision and can be used to maintain an audit trail of the ESY determination and service plan.
  • Collect only the student and family information needed for the ESY decision to align with data minimization principles and reduce unnecessary PII.
  • If the form includes parent or guardian acknowledgment, make the disclosure language clear so families understand what is being recorded and why.
  • For accessibility, the form should use clear labels, logical field order, and accessible validation so staff and families can complete it under WCAG 2.1 AA expectations.
  • If the district uses this form in an intake or accommodation context, include a prompt for reasonable accommodations where needed and avoid requiring information that is not relevant to ESY.

General regulatory context for orientation only — verify current requirements with counsel or the relevant agency before relying on this template for compliance.

What's inside this template

Submission Notice and Consent

This section records why the form is being submitted and whether the required notice or acknowledgment was completed before the decision was finalized.

  • Purpose of submission
  • Acknowledgment of records use and disclosure (required)
  • Parent/guardian notified of ESY review (required)

Student and IEP Identification

This section ties the ESY record to the correct student, current IEP, review date, and case manager so the decision can be traced later.

  • Student ID (required)

    Use the district or student information system identifier; do not enter SSN.

  • Student name (required)
  • Current IEP date (required)
  • ESY review date (required)
  • Case manager (required)

Eligibility Determination

This section captures the yes/no ESY outcome and the evidence the team used to reach that decision.

  • Is the student eligible for ESY services? (required)
  • Primary basis for the decision (required)
  • Data sources reviewed (required)
  • Decision summary (required)

    Summarize the team’s rationale, including any relevant regression/recoupment or skill maintenance data.

ESY Service Plan

This section defines what services will be delivered, when they will start and end, and how they will be provided.

  • Service start date (required)
  • Service end date (required)
  • Service delivery model (required)
  • Service setting (required)
  • Service frequency (required)

    Example: 3 times per week, 30 minutes per session.

  • Implementation notes

    Include staffing, transportation, accessibility, or scheduling notes needed to implement the plan.

Team Members and Sign-Off

This section shows who participated, what parent input was shared, and who prepared the final record for retention.

  • Team members present (required)

    List names and roles of participants present for the ESY determination.

  • Parent/guardian input summary

    Summarize any parent or guardian concerns, preferences, or questions relevant to ESY.

  • Prepared by (required)
  • Submission date (required)

How to use this template

  1. 1. Enter the submission purpose, confirm any required consent acknowledgment, and record whether the parent or guardian was notified before the decision is finalized.
  2. 2. Fill in the student and IEP identification fields so the ESY record is tied to the correct student, current IEP date, review date, and case manager.
  3. 3. Mark whether the student is ESY eligible, then summarize the eligibility basis using the data sources the team actually reviewed.
  4. 4. Define the ESY service plan by entering the start and end dates, delivery model, setting, frequency, and any service notes that affect implementation.
  5. 5. Record the team members, capture parent input, identify who prepared the form, and submit the completed record for district retention and follow-up.

Best practices

  • Use the eligibility basis field to summarize the actual evidence reviewed, not a generic statement that the student 'qualifies for ESY.'
  • Keep the service plan specific by entering dates, setting, delivery model, and frequency instead of leaving the plan at a high level.
  • Capture parent or guardian input in the form itself so the record shows how family perspective was considered during the decision.
  • Use conditional logic to show only the fields needed for the team’s path, especially if the district collects different details for eligible and not eligible outcomes.
  • Mark required versus optional fields clearly so staff do not over-collect PII that is not needed for the ESY decision.
  • Write service notes for implementation details such as scheduling constraints, related services, or accommodations that affect delivery.
  • Review the form before submission to confirm the student name, IEP date, and ESY review date all match the correct record.

What this template typically catches

Issues teams running this template most often surface in practice:

The team records a yes/no ESY decision but does not explain the evidence behind it.
Service dates are left blank or entered as free text that is hard to interpret later.
The delivery model and setting are too vague to support implementation.
Parent input is omitted, even though it influenced the discussion.
The form is completed for the wrong IEP date or student record.
The team lists every possible detail instead of using only the fields needed for the decision.

Common use cases

District Special Education Coordinator
A coordinator uses the form to standardize ESY decisions across schools and keep the eligibility basis, service plan, and sign-off in one record. This makes it easier to review decisions during internal audits or follow-up meetings.
Elementary IEP Team
An elementary team documents ESY for a student who needs summer support to maintain progress on key goals. The form helps the team capture regression and recoupment data, parent input, and the exact service schedule.
Related Service Provider
A speech-language pathologist or occupational therapist contributes service recommendations and notes to the ESY plan. The template keeps those recommendations tied to the student’s current IEP and the team’s final decision.
Charter School Case Manager
A case manager uses the form to document ESY eligibility for a student transferring between service providers. The structured fields reduce confusion about dates, participants, and the planned summer service model.

Frequently asked questions

Who should use this ESY Eligibility Determination Form?

Use it for IEP team meetings where the group must decide whether a student qualifies for Extended School Year services and, if so, what the service plan should include. It is designed for special education case managers, school psychologists, related service providers, and administrators who participate in the decision. Parent or guardian input can also be captured in the form. It works best when the team needs a clear record of both the eligibility rationale and the proposed services.

What does this template actually document?

This template captures the submission purpose, consent acknowledgment, and whether the parent or guardian was notified, followed by student and IEP identifiers. It then records the eligibility decision, the basis for that decision, the data sources reviewed, and a short decision summary. The ESY service plan section captures dates, delivery model, setting, frequency, and notes. The final section records team members, parent input, and sign-off details so the record is complete.

How often is an ESY determination made?

ESY eligibility is typically reviewed during the IEP process for the applicable planning period, often before the end of the school year or when the team is reviewing summer services. This form is not meant for daily use; it is a decision record used when the team evaluates whether services are needed to support continued progress or prevent substantial regression. If your district has a different cadence, the form can be adjusted to match that timeline. The key is to document the decision at the point it is made.

What should count as the eligibility basis?

The eligibility basis should reflect the actual data and team reasoning used to decide ESY, such as progress monitoring, regression and recoupment data, teacher observations, related service input, or other IEP-relevant evidence. Keep it specific to the student rather than using generic language. If the team considered multiple factors, summarize them in plain language and connect them to the decision. Avoid vague statements that do not show how the conclusion was reached.

How does this template support compliance and documentation quality?

It helps the team maintain a clear audit trail of the decision, the data reviewed, and the service plan that follows. The structure also supports good documentation practices by separating eligibility, service planning, and sign-off into distinct sections. Because it is a school form that may include student information, keep data minimization in mind and collect only what is needed for the ESY decision. If your district requires additional notices or procedural safeguards, those can be added as custom fields.

What are the most common mistakes when using an ESY form?

A common mistake is recording only the final yes/no decision without explaining the basis for it. Another is leaving the service plan too vague, such as listing ESY without dates, frequency, or delivery model. Teams also sometimes forget to capture parent input or the names of the participants who made the decision. This template is built to reduce those gaps by prompting the team to document each part of the process.

Can this form be customized for district or state requirements?

Yes. You can add district-specific eligibility criteria, state-required notices, or additional sign-off fields without changing the core structure. Many districts also customize the service plan section to match their scheduling, staffing, or transportation workflows. If your process requires a separate prior written notice or meeting minutes, this form can link to those records. Keep the core fields stable so the decision remains easy to review later.

How does this compare with documenting ESY decisions in meeting notes or email?

Meeting notes and email can capture the conversation, but they often leave out key fields, make review harder, and create inconsistent records across students. A dedicated form gives the team a repeatable structure for the eligibility decision, service plan, and sign-off. That makes it easier to find the record later and easier to confirm that the same process was used for each student. It also reduces the chance that important details are buried in a long narrative.

Go deeper on the topic

Related concepts
  • A standard operating procedure (SOP) is a documented, step-by-step procedure for a repeatable task — the written version of "how we do this here." Good SOPs...
  • Workforce management (WFM) is the operational discipline of getting the right employees, with the right skills, in the right place, at the right time — and...
  • A daily huddle is a brief (10–15 minute) standing meeting held at the start of a shift or workday to align the team on priorities, surface issues, and...
  • A deskless worker is any employee whose job happens without a desk, a company laptop, or a fixed workstation. They're roughly 80% of the global workforce —...
Related guides

Ready to use this template?

Get started with MangoApps and use Extended School Year (ESY) Eligibility Determination Form with your team — pricing built for small business.

Ask AI Product Advisor

Hi! I'm the MangoApps Product Advisor. I can help you with:

  • Understanding our 40+ workplace apps
  • Finding the right solution for your needs
  • Answering questions about pricing and features
  • Pointing you to free tools you can try right now

What would you like to know?