Investment Policy Statement Drafting and Review Worksheet
Use this worksheet to capture a client’s investment objectives, risk tolerance, allocation targets, constraints, and review notes in one IPS drafting session. It helps advisors document decisions clearly and keep the investment policy statement aligned with the client’s current situation.
Trusted by frontline teams 15 years of frontline software AI customization in seconds
Built for: Wealth Management · Registered Investment Advisory · Family Office · Private Banking
Overview
This worksheet is for documenting the inputs that shape an investment policy statement: the client’s objectives, time horizon, return expectations, risk tolerance, liquidity needs, target asset allocation, and any constraints that affect portfolio construction. It is designed for advisor-led meetings where the goal is to draft a new IPS or update an existing one based on current facts, not assumptions.
Use it when you need a structured record of what the client wants, what the account can support, and what limits apply to the portfolio. The submission notice and consent section captures the purpose of the meeting and confirms the client agrees to have the discussion documented. The review context, allocation targets, and special considerations sections help translate conversation into policy language that can be reviewed later.
Do not use this worksheet as a generic meeting note pad or for situations where no IPS is being created or revised. If the client’s needs are unchanged and no policy decision is being made, a lighter review note may be enough. It is also not the right tool when you need a full suitability analysis, a trade ticket, or a legal agreement. The value of this template is that it keeps the IPS process specific, traceable, and ready for approval.
Standards & compliance context
- The consent and attestation fields support a clear audit trail for how the IPS was discussed and approved.
- The worksheet should be limited to the minimum necessary client information needed to draft or update the IPS.
- If you collect any PII, include a clear disclosure about how the information will be used and stored.
- Keep the completed record consistent with your firm’s supervision, retention, and client communication procedures.
General regulatory context for orientation only — verify current requirements with counsel or the relevant agency before relying on this template for compliance.
What's inside this template
Submission Notice and Consent
This section establishes why the worksheet is being completed and confirms the client agrees to have the discussion documented.
- Purpose of this submission
- Client consent to document investment objectives and constraints
- Advisor name
- Meeting date
Client Profile and Review Context
This section explains who the policy applies to and what triggered the current IPS review.
- Client name
- Account type
- What triggered this review?
- Meeting summary and key updates
Investment Objectives
This section captures the client’s goals and time horizon so the IPS reflects the intended purpose of the portfolio.
- Primary investment objective
- Secondary objectives
- Investment time horizon (years)
- Expected return objective
Risk Tolerance and Liquidity Needs
This section records how much volatility the client can accept and how much cash may need to stay available.
- Overall risk tolerance
- Maximum temporary loss the client is comfortable with
- Liquidity needs within the next 12 months
- Liquidity details
Asset Allocation Targets
This section turns the client discussion into target percentages that can guide portfolio construction and rebalancing.
- Target equity allocation (%)
- Target fixed income allocation (%)
- Target cash allocation (%)
- Target alternatives allocation (%)
- Allocation rationale and constraints
Constraints and Special Considerations
This section identifies the limits and exceptions that can change what the portfolio is allowed to hold.
- Applicable constraints
- Constraint details
- Restricted securities or holdings to avoid
- Special considerations
Review, Approval, and Audit Trail
This section closes the loop by documenting status, follow-up actions, attestation, and signature for recordkeeping.
- IPS status after this review
- Follow-up actions
- Client attestation
- Advisor signature
How to use this template
- Start by entering the submission purpose, meeting date, advisor name, and client consent so the record shows why the worksheet was completed and who documented it.
- Capture the client profile, account type, review trigger, and review notes to explain what prompted the IPS discussion and what changed since the last review.
- Record the client’s primary objective, secondary objectives, time horizon, return expectation, risk tolerance, and liquidity needs using specific, decision-ready language.
- Set the target allocation fields for equities, fixed income, cash, and alternatives, then add notes that explain any ranges, exceptions, or rebalancing assumptions.
- Document constraints, restricted securities, and special considerations, then mark the IPS status, follow-up actions, and client attestation so the review can move into approval or revision.
- Store the advisor signature and completed worksheet in the client record so the IPS draft has an audit trail and can be retrieved during future reviews.
Best practices
- Use conditional logic to reveal only the constraint fields that apply, so the worksheet stays focused and does not overwhelm the client.
- Mark required and optional fields clearly, and avoid forcing the client to answer every field when the information is not relevant.
- Use numeric inputs for allocation percentages and time horizon years, and validate that the allocation totals are internally consistent.
- Document liquidity needs in plain terms, including timing and purpose, instead of leaving the field as a vague statement like 'some cash needed.'
- Capture restricted securities and concentration limits explicitly, because these often change the actual investable universe.
- Record the client attestation immediately after the discussion, before the meeting ends, so the audit trail reflects the live review.
- Keep the wording aligned with the client’s own stated objectives and avoid translating preferences into policy language that was never confirmed.
What this template typically catches
Issues teams running this template most often surface in practice:
Common use cases
Frequently asked questions
What is this worksheet used for?
This worksheet is used to gather the information needed to draft or update an investment policy statement during a client meeting. It captures objectives, risk tolerance, liquidity needs, allocation targets, constraints, and approval notes in one place. The result is a cleaner audit trail for the IPS process and fewer gaps between what the client said and what the policy says.
Is this for new clients, annual reviews, or both?
It works for both, but the review trigger field makes it especially useful for annual reviews, life-event updates, and portfolio rebalancing discussions. For new clients, it helps establish the baseline IPS. For existing clients, it helps document what changed and why the policy needs to be revised.
Who should complete this worksheet?
An advisor, wealth manager, or relationship manager usually completes it during the meeting, with the client confirming the answers. If your process includes compliance or operations review, they can use the completed worksheet as the source document for the IPS draft. The advisor signature and client attestation fields support accountability.
How often should an IPS review worksheet be used?
Use it whenever the client’s goals, time horizon, liquidity needs, or risk profile may have changed. Many firms use it at onboarding and then at scheduled review intervals, but it should also be used after major life events, market shocks, or account changes. The review trigger field makes the cadence explicit.
Does this worksheet help with compliance requirements?
Yes, it supports documentation discipline by recording consent, meeting date, client attestation, and an audit trail for policy updates. It is not a legal substitute for your firm’s compliance review, but it helps show how the IPS was informed and approved. Keep the content aligned with your firm’s retention and supervision procedures.
What are the most common mistakes when using it?
Common mistakes include using vague objectives, leaving allocation targets inconsistent with risk tolerance, and skipping liquidity details when the client may need cash soon. Another issue is treating restricted securities or special considerations as optional when they actually affect the policy. The worksheet works best when each field is completed with specific, decision-ready language.
Can this be customized for different client types?
Yes, you can tailor the fields for individuals, trusts, retirement accounts, or institutional clients by adjusting the account type and special considerations sections. You can also add conditional logic for tax constraints, ESG preferences, or concentration limits. Keep the core fields intact so the worksheet still supports a usable IPS draft.
How does this compare with taking notes in a meeting doc or email?
A structured worksheet is easier to review, approve, and audit than scattered notes or email threads. It reduces the risk of missing a constraint, misreading an allocation target, or forgetting to document client consent. It also makes it simpler to turn meeting notes into a consistent IPS update.
What should happen after the client submits or reviews it?
After review, the advisor should confirm the IPS status, assign follow-up actions, and route the worksheet into the firm’s documentation or approval workflow. If the client attests to the content, that confirmation should be stored with the meeting record. The next step is usually drafting or revising the IPS based on the completed worksheet.
Related templates
Go deeper on the topic
-
Lockout/tagout (LOTO) is the procedure for controlling hazardous energy — electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic, mechanical, thermal, chemical — before...
-
Job hazard analysis (JHA) — also called job safety analysis (JSA) — is the structured exercise of breaking a work task into sequential steps, identifying the...
-
A near-miss is an event that could have caused injury or damage but didn't — a slip that didn't fall, a load that shifted but didn't drop, a machine that...
-
AI governance is the framework a company uses to decide what AI tools are allowed to do, who's accountable for their outputs, what data they're allowed to...
-
Frontline workers observe critical issues that never reach operational systems. See how AI-powered media capture in forms and inspections closes that gap.
-
MangoApps launches centralized task management for frontline workers, streamlining workflows, compliance, and execution across locations.
-
Learn how AI-driven workflows close compliance gaps in hiring, field inspections, and compensation — before they become audit findings.
-
Discover how manual performance review processes drain HR productivity, introduce payroll errors, and stall talent strategy — and what automated systems fix.
Ready to use this template?
Get started with MangoApps and use Investment Policy Statement Drafting and Review Worksheet with your team — pricing built for small business.