Loading...

Run: Engagement Benchmark Review

Compare current employee engagement against your own baseline with a survey that surfaces shifts in eNPS, manager effectiveness, psychological safety, recogn...

Fill this out, get a PDF emailed to you. No account required. Want to run it with your team and track results? Sign up free →

Overall Engagement & eNPS

Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). This is the headline engagement indicator tracked period-over-period.
eNPS anchor item. 0–6 = Detractor, 7–8 = Passive, 9–10 = Promoter. Select the number that best reflects your likelihood.
Open follow-up on your eNPS rating. Your response helps us understand the 'why' behind the number.
Improved significantly / Improved somewhat / Stayed about the same / Declined somewhat / Declined significantly. This self-reported trend item is the core benchmark comparison signal.

Role Clarity & Meaningful Work

Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). Mirrors Gallup Q12 item 1 (role clarity).
Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). Tracks the 'mission connection' engagement driver.
Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). Mirrors Gallup Q12 item 2 (resources).
Open follow-up for detractor ratings. Helps identify systemic blockers to clarity and meaningful work.

Manager Effectiveness

Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). Manager feedback quality is a leading indicator of engagement decline.
Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). Mirrors Gallup Q12 item 5 (manager cares).
Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). Growth opportunity through manager is a top retention driver.
Open follow-up for detractor ratings. Responses are anonymous and used to shape manager development programs.

Recognition, Belonging & Psychological Safety

Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). Mirrors Gallup Q12 item 4 (recognition). 30-day recall window reduces recency bias.
Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). Belonging is a core engagement driver and a leading indicator of voluntary turnover.
Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). Psychological safety item (Amy Edmondson framework). Low scores here suppress all other engagement signals.
Open follow-up for detractor ratings. Responses are anonymous. Patterns here often reveal cultural or team-level issues invisible in aggregate scores.

Growth, Development & Intent to Stay

Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). Six-month window aligns with benchmark review cadence.
Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). Career path visibility is a top-three predictor of intent to stay.
Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5). Intent-to-stay item. This is the most direct leading indicator of voluntary turnover risk.
Open follow-up for respondents who rated intent to stay 3 or below. These responses directly inform retention strategy.

Open Feedback & Optional Demographics

Unconstrained open-ended item. Responses here often surface themes not captured by any structured scale.
Standard 'Anything else?' close. Preserves space for topics the survey didn't anticipate.
Less than 6 months / 6–12 months / 1–3 years / 3–5 years / More than 5 years. Optional. Collected last to minimize anonymity-perception bias. Used to segment benchmark trends by tenure cohort.
Optional. Used only when response volume is sufficient to report at sub-group level without risking de-anonymization (minimum n=5 per group). Leave blank if you prefer not to share.

Get your results

Enter your email — we'll send you a PDF of your filled-out template, plus the occasional MangoScoop newsletter (templates, workflow tips, product updates). Unsubscribe anytime — link is in every email.

Generated with MangoApps Templates — browse 250+ free