Run Low Migration Ink Statement of Composition Review — Free

Inspection Details

Ink product and supplier identified

Record the ink product name, supplier, and internal material code being reviewed.

Intended application confirmed as food packaging critical (required)

Confirm the intended end use and substrate type for the ink.

Review date recorded

Capture the date and time the Statement of Composition review was completed.

Reviewer name and function recorded

Enter the reviewer name, role, and department (e.g., QA, regulatory affairs, production).

Statement of Composition Completeness

Current Statement of Composition provided by supplier critical (required)

Verify the supplier has provided a current SoC for the exact ink formulation reviewed.

Yes No N/A

SoC identifies all intentionally added substances critical (required)

Confirm the document lists the intentionally added components, including pigments, binders, additives, and solvents where applicable.

Yes No N/A

CAS numbers and concentrations are stated where required critical (required)

Check whether the SoC includes substance identifiers and concentration ranges sufficient for compliance review.

Yes No N/A

Revision status and effective date are current critical (required)

Verify the SoC revision matches the ink version currently proposed for use.

Yes No N/A

Migration and Restricted Substance Review

Migration declaration supports intended food-packaging use critical (required)

Confirm the supplier declaration addresses migration risk for the intended application and curing conditions.

Yes No N/A

Restricted substances are screened against Swiss Ordinance requirements critical (required)

Verify the formulation has been screened for substances restricted or listed under applicable Swiss Ordinance requirements for materials and articles in contact with food.

Yes No N/A

No prohibited or undeclared substances identified critical (required)

Confirm the review found no prohibited, undeclared, or unapproved substances that would prevent food-packaging use.

Yes No N/A

Residual solvents or volatile components are controlled critical (required)

Verify the SoC or supporting documentation addresses residual solvents, drying conditions, and any controls needed to prevent migration.

Yes No N/A

Food-Packaging Compliance Controls

Declared for direct or indirect food-contact packaging use critical (required)

Identify the permitted use category stated by the supplier or internal approval.

Functional barrier or process controls documented where needed critical (required)

Confirm any required functional barrier, curing, or process controls are documented and available to production.

Yes No N/A

Food-packaging compliance statement present critical (required)

Verify the supplier or internal technical file includes a clear compliance statement for the intended packaging use.

Yes No N/A

Supporting test data or rationale available

Check whether migration testing, worst-case rationale, or equivalent technical justification is available to support the approval decision.

Yes No N/A

Approval, Documentation, and Release

Non-conformances documented with corrective action

List any deficiencies, non-conformances, or open questions identified during the review.

Material approved for use critical (required)

Final disposition of the ink for the intended food-packaging application.

Yes No N/A

Reviewer signature critical (required)

Signature confirming the review and approval decision.

Get your results

Enter your email — we'll send you a PDF of your filled-out template, plus the occasional MangoScoop newsletter (templates, workflow tips, product updates). Unsubscribe anytime — link is in every email.

Email (required)

Your name (optional)

Run: Low Migration Ink Statement of Composition Review

Inspection Details

Statement of Composition Completeness

Migration and Restricted Substance Review

Food-Packaging Compliance Controls

Approval, Documentation, and Release

Get your results