HiPo Program Feedback Survey

Collects participant feedback on a high-potential cohort program covering curriculum quality, sponsorship effectiveness, peer learning, and career development value. Used by program managers and L&D leaders to improve the program between cohorts.

Curriculum Quality and Relevance

• The program curriculum addressed leadership challenges that are directly relevant to my current or target role.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• The learning modules were well-sequenced and built on each other in a logical progression.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• The balance between conceptual frameworks and practical application exercises was appropriate.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• Which module or topic delivered the most value to you, and why?
  Please be specific — your answer directly shapes future curriculum design.
• Which module or topic felt least relevant or could be removed or replaced?
  Honest feedback here helps us allocate time to what matters most.

Facilitation and Learning Experience

• Facilitators demonstrated deep expertise in the topics they delivered.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• Facilitators created a psychologically safe environment where I felt comfortable sharing openly and challenging ideas.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• The program sessions were engaging and held my attention throughout.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• If you rated any of the above 3 or below, please describe what would have improved the facilitation experience.
  Optional — but your input helps us select and brief facilitators more effectively.

Sponsorship and Executive Engagement

• My assigned sponsor was actively engaged and invested in my development throughout the program.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• My sponsor provided candid, actionable feedback that helped me grow as a leader.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• Executive speakers and guest leaders added meaningful perspective beyond what facilitators provided.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• How could the sponsorship model be strengthened to better support participant development?
  Consider frequency of touchpoints, sponsor preparation, and accountability structures.

Peer Learning and Cohort Experience

• Learning alongside peers in this cohort meaningfully enhanced my development experience.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• The cohort created a strong network of relationships I expect to draw on after the program ends.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• Peer feedback and group activities were structured in a way that produced genuine insight.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• What changes to cohort composition, size, or peer interaction design would improve the group learning dynamic?
  Examples: cohort size, cross-functional mix, action learning project structure, peer coaching pairs.

Career Development Impact and Intent to Apply

• Participating in this program has meaningfully accelerated my readiness for greater leadership responsibility.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• I have a clear individual development plan with specific actions I intend to take as a result of this program.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• On a scale of 0–10, how likely are you to recommend this program to a high-potential colleague?
  0 = Would not recommend at all, 10 = Would strongly recommend (eNPS indicator)
• What is the primary reason for your recommendation score above?
  This is the single most important open-ended question — please share your honest view.
• How well did the program align with your personal career development goals coming into the cohort?
  Select one: Exceeded my expectations / Met my expectations / Partially met my expectations / Did not meet my expectations

Program Logistics and Closing Feedback

• The time commitment required by the program was manageable alongside my day-to-day responsibilities.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• Pre-work, reading materials, and resources were well-organized and easy to access.
  Strongly disagree → Strongly agree (1–5)
• What is the single most important change you would make to improve this program for the next cohort?
  Please be as specific as possible — one focused suggestion is more actionable than a general comment.
• Is there anything else you'd like to share about your experience in this program?
  This is your space — any feedback not captured above is welcome here.