content

Hiring Manager Playbook

A six-page hiring manager and interviewer playbook that guides role definition, interview preparation, evidence discussion, decision-record boundaries, and handoff. Use it to coordinate a fairer, role-related process while keeping applicant records in your recruiting system.

Request pricing See it in MangoApps

Every employee gets a seat — priced per employee in Communications & Intranet, quoted with this template ready.

Rolled out to every employee at AutoZone (125,000), PetSmart (50,000+), A.S. Watson and Raley's (20,000) — and at larger retailers we are not permitted to name.

Built for: Technology and software · Professional services · Healthcare administration

9:41

Sites

Overview

Hiring Manager Playbook is a six-page intranet site for coordinating a hiring process from role definition through handoff to the receiving manager. Its landing page directs readers to each stage and gives an illustrative role-boundary table for the hiring manager, interviewer, recruiting partner, and receiving manager. The navigation follows the same sequence, so readers can open the page that matches the work in front of them.

The stage pages turn that sequence into practical guidance. Define the role covers work outcomes, essential requirements, and observable evidence. Prepare interviews helps the hiring manager assign complementary interviewer focuses and coordinate with the recruiting partner. Gather evidence distinguishes observations, interpretations, and open questions; Make the decision structures an evidence discussion without imposing a score or approval rule. Hand over the hire clarifies transition responsibilities and where recruiting records and development resources belong. Fictional Northstar Works examples show how to replace broad impressions with role-related observations.

Use the playbook as shared intranet guidance when managers and interviewers need a consistent reference for coordination. Adapt its examples and process language to confirmed organizational practices, and link to the approved Structured Interview Kit, recruiting system, and Training & Development Hub only after verifying those destinations. Do not use it to store candidate information, track applications, schedule interviews, or record authoritative decisions. It is not a substitute for local hiring policy, legal review, or an organization's recruiting workflow; keep those authoritative materials in their established homes.

Standards & compliance context

Treat the role-related evidence examples as guidance, not as a legal standard, scoring policy, approval threshold, or substitute for local hiring requirements.
Keep applicant information and authoritative decision records in the organization's approved recruiting system and follow its access, retention, and recordkeeping rules.
Have appropriate HR, recruiting, and legal owners review jurisdiction-specific hiring procedures before adopting the playbook as operational guidance.
Check that page headings, link labels, table content, and navigation remain usable with assistive technology and meet your organization's accessibility requirements, including applicable WCAG 2.1 AA practices.

General regulatory context for orientation only — verify current requirements with counsel or the relevant agency before relying on this template for compliance.

What's inside this template

Hiring Manager Playbook

Run a coordinated hiring process
This playbook uses Northstar Works, a fictional distributed organization, to illustrate the handoffs involved in hiring. Align role expectations, coordinate interviewers, discuss relevant evidence, and hand over next actions here; keep applicant records and authoritative hiring decisions in your organization's recruiting system. This site is guidance, not a live workflow.
Go to a hiring stage
Choose the task you need to move forward. Define the role Agree on work outcomes and useful evidence before arranging interviews. Prepare interviews Coordinate the panel, sequence, and interviewer focus. Gather evidence Capture observations tied to role outcomes rather than broad impressions. Make the decision Discuss evidence against agreed outcomes and record the decision in the recruiting system. Hand over the hire Coordinate the transition to the receiving manager.
Common coordination moments
Start with the stage that addresses the immediate work. A panel spans three time zones Agree each interviewer's focus and sequence before the recruiting partner coordinates scheduling. Start with Prepare interviews. An interview needs to be rescheduled Route the scheduling change through the recruiting partner and keep the panel's agreed focus clear. Start with Prepare interviews. Panel feedback points in different directions Compare observations with agreed role outcomes, name gaps, and use the recruiting process for the decision record. Start with Make the decision.
Who coordinates what
Illustrative role boundaries for Northstar Works; follow your organization's approved process. Role Coordinates Handoff or boundary Hiring manager Defines role outcomes, convenes the panel, and leads the evidence discussion. Works with the recruiting partner on process questions and the decision record. Interviewer Follows the agreed interview focus and contributes specific, role-related observations. Shares interview evidence through the organization's recruiting process. Recruiting partner Coordinates the recruiting process and advises on its steps and records. Is the first route for process, scheduling, and recruiting-system questions. Receiving manager Takes responsibility for the new hire's next work after the hiring handoff. Aligns next actions with the hiring manager and recruiting partner through approved channels.

Define the role

Agree on the work before arranging interviews
The hiring manager and recruiting partner establish a shared role brief. Start by naming the work the role must deliver and the evidence that could show readiness. Separate essential outcomes from preferences, then use the agreed outcomes to shape the interview plan. In Northstar Works' fictional example, the hiring manager owns the role outcomes; the recruiting partner coordinates the recruiting process and advises on its steps. Bring process questions to the assigned recruiting partner.
Build a useful role brief
Keep each step tied to work the person would actually do. Describe the need State what work needs to be done and why the role is being hired now. Name essential outcomes Write the results or responsibilities the role must deliver. Keep preferences separate from requirements. Identify observable evidence For each outcome, name a work-related example, explanation, or demonstration that could provide relevant evidence. Align with the recruiting partner Review the role brief and agree how the outcomes will inform the interview plan and recruiting process.
Worked example: make a requirement observable
A role outcome gives interviewers something specific to explore. From vague preference to useful evidence The fictional Northstar Works hiring team started with “strong communicator” and revised it to a work outcome that interviewers could explore consistently. Role outcome: Explain a project trade-off to colleagues from different functions, including its impact on timing and scope. Evidence prompt: Ask for an example of explaining a work trade-off and how the speaker checked that others understood the consequences. Relevant observation: Note the trade-off described, the explanation given, and how understanding was checked—not whether the person simply seemed polished.
Next: prepare the interviews
Use agreed outcomes to divide panel responsibilities. Continue to Prepare interviews. Confirm role outcomes with the recruiting partner. Agree the interview sequence and each participant's focus. Bring unresolved role or process questions to the assigned recruiting partner.

Prepare interviews

Give every interview a clear purpose
The hiring manager aligns the panel; the recruiting partner coordinates process and scheduling. Before interviews are arranged, agree the sequence, each participant's role-related focus, and how observations will be shared through the recruiting process. For a distributed panel, the hiring manager confirms the panel plan with the recruiting partner, who coordinates the process. Plan each conversation around outcomes in the role brief. This helps the panel gather complementary evidence rather than repeating broad questions without a shared purpose.
Prepare for complementary evidence
A useful plan gives each interviewer a defined contribution connected to agreed role outcomes. Useful preparation Assign distinct, role-related areas and agree how each interviewer will share observations. Name the outcome each conversation will explore. Share the interview sequence with the recruiting partner. Use the agreed route for scheduling changes. Avoid duplicated conversations Repeating broad questions across every conversation can use panel time without adding a clear evidence perspective. Do not assign the same broad topic to every interviewer by default. Align with the hiring manager before changing an interview's focus. Do not treat a calendar plan as an applicant record.
Keep the reusable interview kit in its own home
Use the approved interview kit alongside the coordination steps in this playbook. Structured Interview Kit Use your organization’s approved Structured Interview Kit for reusable questions and evidence notes. Ask the recruiting partner for the current resource if you cannot find it. This playbook Use this page to agree the sequence, interviewer focus, and recruiting-partner handoff. Keep applicant-specific details in the recruiting system.
After the interviews: gather evidence
Interviewers contribute specific observations through the recruiting process. Continue to Gather evidence. Capture what the candidate said or did in relation to an agreed role outcome. Share observations through the organization's recruiting process, not in this site. Bring a question or gap to the hiring manager for the evidence discussion.

Gather evidence

Record what happened, not just how it felt
Interviewers contribute relevant observations; the recruiting system remains the record. Describe what the candidate said or did and connect it to an agreed role outcome. Separate that observation from your interpretation, and identify any question the evidence has not answered. Use the organization's recruiting process for interview notes and applicant information. The examples here are guidance, not a recruiting-system record, rating scale, or scoring policy.
Worked example: replace an impression with an observation
A concise example helps the panel discuss the same work evidence. Role outcome: explain a work trade-off In this fictional Northstar Works example, the panel is exploring how a candidate explains a trade-off in a cross-functional project. Less useful: “Seemed confident.” This does not say what was observed or how it relates to the role. More useful: “Described choosing a smaller launch scope to keep the agreed delivery date; explained the impact on two dependent teams and said they checked each team's understanding.” Question to discuss: “The example explains the trade-off; what further evidence would clarify how changing priorities were communicated?”
Separate observation, interpretation, and open question
A discussion reference—not a form or replacement for the recruiting system. Contribution Example What it helps the panel do Observation Explained a scope change, its effect on two teams, and how understanding was checked. Discuss what was said or done in relation to the role outcome. Interpretation This may be relevant to explaining cross-functional trade-offs. Make the reasoning visible and compare it with the agreed outcome. Open question The example did not clarify how the person would handle a later priority change. Name what remains unknown rather than filling the gap with an assumption.
Next: discuss the evidence
Keep applicant-specific notes and decision records in the recruiting system. Continue to Make the decision. Share interview evidence through the organization's recruiting process. Compare observations with outcomes agreed in the role brief. Bring differences or unanswered questions to the hiring discussion.

Make the decision

Decide against role outcomes, not a general impression
The hiring team discusses evidence; the recruiting process holds the authoritative decision record. Revisit agreed role outcomes, hear each interviewer's relevant observations, and distinguish evidence from inference. Surface gaps and differing interpretations before following your organization's recruiting-system process for the decision. The examples here show how to structure a discussion. They do not set an approval rule, scoring threshold, or hiring policy.
Run a focused evidence discussion
Revisit the role outcomes Use the agreed role brief as the shared reference for the discussion. Hear each interviewer's evidence Ask for observations tied to the interviewer's agreed focus. Separate evidence from inference Make clear what was observed and what the panel is interpreting. Name gaps or differences Discuss unanswered questions and differing interpretations against the role outcomes. Follow the recruiting process Use the organization's recruiting-system process for the decision and its authoritative record.
Two different discussion situations
A useful discussion connects evidence to the role, rather than relying on confidence or unanimity alone. Strong impression, little role evidence The panel describes a candidate as impressive but cannot identify observations related to the agreed outcomes. Ask which specific example supports the impression. Identify which role outcome, if any, it addresses. State what remains unanswered instead of treating confidence as evidence. Mixed evidence tied to an outcome One interviewer heard a clear explanation of a project trade-off; another did not hear how the person responded when priorities changed. Discuss both observations against the relevant role outcome. Keep the gap visible rather than averaging away the difference. Follow the recruiting process for the decision and record.
After the decision: coordinate the handoff
Use the approved recruiting process for the decision record and next actions. Continue to Hand over the hire. Confirm required recruiting-process steps with the assigned recruiting partner. Align the receiving manager and recruiting partner on appropriate next actions. Share role context through approved channels, not applicant notes copied into this site.

Hand over the hire

Coordinate the transition to the receiving manager
This page covers the hiring-to-onboarding handoff, not onboarding or development guidance. Align the hiring manager, recruiting partner, and receiving manager on agreed next actions through approved channels. Share only role context appropriate for the transition. Applicant information and the authoritative decision record remain in the recruiting system. Ask the receiving manager which approved training and development resources support the new hire’s first assignments, and carry that ownership into the handoff.
Make the handoff clear
This is a coordination sequence, not an automated workflow or status tracker. Check the recruiting-process record The hiring manager and recruiting partner confirm the decision record and required next actions through the organization's recruiting process. Align the receiving manager Share agreed next steps and role context needed to prepare for the transition through approved channels. Keep applicant details in the right place Do not copy applicant notes or decision details into this playbook or an unrelated handoff reference. Move development guidance to its home Use the organization's Training & Development Hub for development resources instead of duplicating those materials here.
Illustrative handoff reference
Fictional example with no applicant details; not a task queue or system of record. Handoff topic Responsible role Keep in the recruiting system Decision record and recruiting-process next actions Hiring manager and recruiting partner Authoritative decision and applicant-specific records Role outcomes relevant to the receiving manager's preparation Hiring manager Any applicant-specific notes or interview evidence Agreed transition actions Receiving manager and recruiting partner Recruiting-process records and applicant information Development resources after the hiring handoff Receiving manager The hiring record remains in the recruiting system; development guidance belongs in the established training hub.
Continue with the appropriate next resource
Keep each authoritative resource in its own home. Applicant records and authoritative hiring decisions stay in the recruiting system. Return to the playbook's hiring stages when another hiring coordination task remains. Use the organization's established Training & Development Hub for onboarding and development guidance. Bring recruiting-process or record questions to the assigned recruiting partner.

How to use this template

Review the six-page navigation and replace fictional Northstar Works references with confirmed organizational terminology and approved process guidance.
Verify the recruiting-system, Structured Interview Kit, and Training & Development Hub destinations through your site's supported setup, and remove or revise any destination that is unavailable.
Ask the hiring manager and recruiting partner to agree role outcomes and observable evidence on Define the role before arranging interviews.
Have the hiring manager confirm the panel sequence and each interviewer's role-related focus with the recruiting partner, then direct interviewers to Gather evidence for note-taking guidance.
Run the evidence discussion against the agreed outcomes, distinguish observations from interpretations and open questions, and record the authoritative decision only through the recruiting process.
Align next actions with the receiving manager through approved channels, keep applicant details in the recruiting system, and review the playbook when the approved process or linked resources change.

Best practices

Write essential role outcomes as work the person must deliver, and keep preferences separate from requirements.
For each outcome, name evidence an interviewer could observe, such as a work example, explanation, or demonstration.
Assign each interviewer a distinct focus tied to the role brief and confirm scheduling changes through the recruiting partner.
Describe what the candidate said or did before adding an interpretation, and label unanswered questions explicitly.
When feedback conflicts, compare the specific observations with the agreed outcome instead of relying on confidence, consensus, or a general impression.
Keep applicant notes, interview evidence, and authoritative decision records in the recruiting system rather than this intranet site.
Use the approved Structured Interview Kit for reusable questions and evidence notes; keep this playbook focused on coordination and handoffs.
Review the pages and their destinations when recruiting procedures or authoritative resources change, and ask the assigned recruiting partner to resolve process questions.

What this template typically catches

Issues teams running this template most often surface in practice:

A role brief uses broad traits such as “strong communicator” without describing the work outcome or observable evidence.

Multiple interviewers repeat broad questions because their individual focuses were never agreed.

Interview feedback describes a candidate as impressive or confident but does not identify role-related observations.

Panel members treat interpretation as fact or fill an evidence gap with an assumption.

Different observations are averaged into a general view before the panel names what remains unclear.

Candidate notes or decision details are copied into an intranet page or an unrelated handoff reference.

Managers are unsure who owns scheduling, process questions, the decision record, or receiving-manager next actions.

The playbook or its links become stale after an approved process or shared resource changes.

Common use cases

Hiring manager defining a role

A manager turns a broad request into essential work outcomes and observable evidence before interviews are arranged. The recruiting partner can then use the agreed brief to advise on the process and interview plan.

Recruiting partner coordinating a distributed panel

When interviewers span time zones or a conversation needs rescheduling, the hiring manager can use Prepare interviews to keep each focus distinct and coordinate changes through the recruiting partner. The page makes clear that a calendar plan is not an applicant record.

Interview panel discussing mixed evidence

After interviewers share role-related observations through the recruiting process, the hiring manager can use Gather evidence and Make the decision to identify interpretations, gaps, and differing views. The template guides discussion without supplying a rating scale or hiring threshold.

Receiving manager preparing for a handoff

The hiring manager and recruiting partner can use Hand over the hire to align appropriate next actions with the receiving manager. The page keeps applicant details and decision records in the recruiting system and points development guidance back to its established home.

Frequently asked questions

What parts of the hiring process does this playbook cover?

It covers five stages: defining the role, preparing interviews, gathering evidence, discussing a decision, and handing off to the receiving manager. The landing page also clarifies the responsibilities of the hiring manager, interviewer, recruiting partner, and receiving manager. It is coordination guidance, not a recruiting workflow or system of record.

Who should use the playbook?

Hiring managers can use it to agree role outcomes, convene a panel, and lead evidence discussions. Interviewers can use it to understand their assigned focus and contribute specific observations through the organization's recruiting process. Recruiting partners and receiving managers can refer to the stated handoff boundaries.

When should a team use it, and how often?

Use the relevant page for each hiring effort, from role definition through the transition to the receiving manager. Return to the interview-preparation or evidence pages when coordination questions arise during a search. The template does not prescribe a calendar cadence; follow your organization's recruiting process for timing and required steps.

Does this template meet hiring or employment-law requirements?

The playbook encourages role-related evidence and separates observations from interpretations, but it does not establish legal compliance, an approval rule, a scoring threshold, or hiring policy. Requirements vary by jurisdiction and organization. Have the appropriate HR, recruiting, and legal owners review local procedures, approved materials, and recordkeeping rules before rollout.

Where do interview notes and hiring decisions belong?

Applicant-specific information, interview notes, and authoritative decision records belong in your organization's recruiting system and approved process. This intranet site is guidance, not a live workflow, task queue, or applicant record. Do not copy candidate details into its pages or general handoff references.

How can we customize the fictional Northstar Works examples?

Replace the fictional organization's context with confirmed role names, responsibilities, and locally approved process guidance. Review the worked examples to ensure they fit the jobs and interview practices your organization actually uses. Keep shared policies and reusable interview materials in their authoritative homes, linking to them only through confirmed destinations.

Does the playbook integrate with our recruiting system or calendar?

No live integration or workflow is specified in this template. It directs managers and interviewers to use the organization's recruiting process for scheduling, applicant information, evidence sharing, and decision records. Connect or link a live system only through your site's supported setup and verified destinations.

How should we roll this out to a hiring panel?

Confirm the recruiting partner's approved process and identify the authoritative recruiting-system and interview-kit resources before publishing. Ask hiring managers to start with the role brief, then share the relevant stage page with interviewers before their conversations. Explain that the pages coordinate guidance and do not replace official records or policy.

Why use this instead of coordinating hiring informally?

Informal coordination can leave interviewers unclear about role outcomes, duplicate broad questions, or rely on general impressions during discussions. This playbook provides a sequence, role boundaries, and concrete examples for connecting observations to agreed outcomes. Teams still need to use their recruiting system and approved process for applicant records and decisions.

What should we do when interviewers disagree or evidence is incomplete?

Return to the agreed role outcomes and ask each interviewer to describe the specific observation behind their interpretation. Name unanswered questions and differences rather than smoothing them into a general impression. Follow the recruiting partner's guidance and your organization's recruiting process for any next step or decision record.

Related templates

Sites

Performance Review Preparation

Prepare for a performance-review conversation with prompts for agreed outcomes, observable eviden...

Sites

Cultural and Religious Observance Calendar Guide

A practical intranet guide for planning events around cultural and religious observances, reviewi...

Sites

Cross-Company Practice Exchange

Cross-Company Practice Exchange is a single-page intranet template for comparing fictional operat...

Sites

Software Purchase or Install Decision

Use this employee reference page to check an approved-tools list, choose a listed tool when it fi...

Sites

Prepare a Useful One-to-One

Prepare a useful one-to-one with a short guide for managers and employees: choose a focus, make s...

Forms

Employee Onboarding Form

Employee Onboarding Form for collecting new hire details, tax references, direct deposit, emergen...

Inspections

Abandoned Channel Hygiene Audit

Abandoned Channel Hygiene Audit template for reviewing inactive, orphaned, and duplicate communic...

Sop

New Employee Onboarding Checklist

New Employee Onboarding Checklist template for standardizing pre-boarding, first-day orientation,...

Go deeper on the topic

Related concepts

Talent Acquisition

Talent acquisition (TA) is the organizational function responsible for attracting, evaluating, and hiring employees — what was historically called recruiting...
Digital Workplace vs Modern Intranet

A modern intranet is a specific surface — typically the home-base destination where employees get company news, find policies, and access key apps. A digital...

Ready to use this template?

Every employee gets a seat. Request pricing for Communications & Intranet and we quote into a workspace with Hiring Manager Playbook ready.

Request pricing

Rolled out to every employee at AutoZone (125,000), PetSmart (50,000+), A.S. Watson and Raley's (20,000) — and at larger retailers we are not permitted to name.

6 pages Hiring Manager Playbook Define the role Prepare interviews Gather evidence Make the decision Hand over the hire

Hiring Manager Playbook Run a coordinated hiring process This playbook uses Northstar Works, a fictional distributed organization, to illustrate the handoffs involved in hiring. Align role expectations, coordinate interviewers, discuss relevant evidence, and hand over next actions here; keep applicant records and authoritative hiring decisions in your organization's recruiting system. This site is guidance, not a live workflow. Go to a hiring stage Choose the task you need to move forward. Define the role Agree on work outcomes and useful evidence before arranging interviews. Prepare interviews Coordinate the panel, sequence, and interviewer focus. Gather evidence Capture observations tied to role outcomes rather than broad impressions. Make the decision Discuss evidence against agreed outcomes and record the decision in the recruiting system. Hand over the hire Coordinate the transition to the receiving manager. Common coordination moments Start with the stage that addresses the immediate work. A panel spans three time zones Agree each interviewer's focus and sequence before the recruiting partner coordinates scheduling. Start with Prepare interviews. An interview needs to be rescheduled Route the scheduling change through the recruiting partner and keep the panel's agreed focus clear. Start with Prepare interviews. Panel feedback points in different directions Compare observations with agreed role outcomes, name gaps, and use the recruiting process for the decision record. Start with Make the decision. Who coordinates what Illustrative role boundaries for Northstar Works; follow your organization's approved process. Role Coordinates Handoff or boundary Hiring manager Defines role outcomes, convenes the panel, and leads the evidence discussion. Works with the recruiting partner on process questions and the decision record. Interviewer Follows the agreed interview focus and contributes specific, role-related observations. Shares interview evidence through the organization's recruiting process. Recruiting partner Coordinates the recruiting process and advises on its steps and records. Is the first route for process, scheduling, and recruiting-system questions. Receiving manager Takes responsibility for the new hire's next work after the hiring handoff. Aligns next actions with the hiring manager and recruiting partner through approved channels. Define the role Agree on the work before arranging interviews The hiring manager and recruiting partner establish a shared role brief. Start by naming the work the role must deliver and the evidence that could show readiness. Separate essential outcomes from preferences, then use the agreed outcomes to shape the interview plan. In Northstar Works' fictional example, the hiring manager owns the role outcomes; the recruiting partner coordinates the recruiting process and advises on its steps. Bring process questions to the assigned recruiting partner. Build a useful role brief Keep each step tied to work the person would actually do. Describe the need State what work needs to be done and why the role is being hired now. Name essential outcomes Write the results or responsibilities the role must deliver. Keep preferences separate from requirements. Identify observable evidence For each outcome, name a work-related example, explanation, or demonstration that could provide relevant evidence. Align with the recruiting partner Review the role brief and agree how the outcomes will inform the interview plan and recruiting process. Worked example: make a requirement observable A role outcome gives interviewers something specific to explore. From vague preference to useful evidence The fictional Northstar Works hiring team started with “strong communicator” and revised it to a work outcome that interviewers could explore consistently. Role outcome: Explain a project trade-off to colleagues from different functions, including its impact on timing and scope. Evidence prompt: Ask for an example of explaining a work trade-off and how the speaker checked that others understood the consequences. Relevant observation: Note the trade-off described, the explanation given, and how understanding was checked—not whether the person simply seemed polished. Next: prepare the interviews Use agreed outcomes to divide panel responsibilities. Continue to Prepare interviews. Confirm role outcomes with the recruiting partner. Agree the interview sequence and each participant's focus. Bring unresolved role or process questions to the assigned recruiting partner. Prepare interviews Give every interview a clear purpose The hiring manager aligns the panel; the recruiting partner coordinates process and scheduling. Before interviews are arranged, agree the sequence, each participant's role-related focus, and how observations will be shared through the recruiting process. For a distributed panel, the hiring manager confirms the panel plan with the recruiting partner, who coordinates the process. Plan each conversation around outcomes in the role brief. This helps the panel gather complementary evidence rather than repeating broad questions without a shared purpose. Prepare for complementary evidence A useful plan gives each interviewer a defined contribution connected to agreed role outcomes. Useful preparation Assign distinct, role-related areas and agree how each interviewer will share observations. Name the outcome each conversation will explore. Share the interview sequence with the recruiting partner. Use the agreed route for scheduling changes. Avoid duplicated conversations Repeating broad questions across every conversation can use panel time without adding a clear evidence perspective. Do not assign the same broad topic to every interviewer by default. Align with the hiring manager before changing an interview's focus. Do not treat a calendar plan as an applicant record. Keep the reusable interview kit in its own home Use the approved interview kit alongside the coordination steps in this playbook. Structured Interview Kit Use your organization’s approved Structured Interview Kit for reusable questions and evidence notes. Ask the recruiting partner for the current resource if you cannot find it. This playbook Use this page to agree the sequence, interviewer focus, and recruiting-partner handoff. Keep applicant-specific details in the recruiting system. After the interviews: gather evidence Interviewers contribute specific observations through the recruiting process. Continue to Gather evidence. Capture what the candidate said or did in relation to an agreed role outcome. Share observations through the organization's recruiting process, not in this site. Bring a question or gap to the hiring manager for the evidence discussion. Gather evidence Record what happened, not just how it felt Interviewers contribute relevant observations; the recruiting system remains the record. Describe what the candidate said or did and connect it to an agreed role outcome. Separate that observation from your interpretation, and identify any question the evidence has not answered. Use the organization's recruiting process for interview notes and applicant information. The examples here are guidance, not a recruiting-system record, rating scale, or scoring policy. Worked example: replace an impression with an observation A concise example helps the panel discuss the same work evidence. Role outcome: explain a work trade-off In this fictional Northstar Works example, the panel is exploring how a candidate explains a trade-off in a cross-functional project. Less useful: “Seemed confident.” This does not say what was observed or how it relates to the role. More useful: “Described choosing a smaller launch scope to keep the agreed delivery date; explained the impact on two dependent teams and said they checked each team's understanding.” Question to discuss: “The example explains the trade-off; what further evidence would clarify how changing priorities were communicated?” Separate observation, interpretation, and open question A discussion reference—not a form or replacement for the recruiting system. Contribution Example What it helps the panel do Observation Explained a scope change, its effect on two teams, and how understanding was checked. Discuss what was said or done in relation to the role outcome. Interpretation This may be relevant to explaining cross-functional trade-offs. Make the reasoning visible and compare it with the agreed outcome. Open question The example did not clarify how the person would handle a later priority change. Name what remains unknown rather than filling the gap with an assumption. Next: discuss the evidence Keep applicant-specific notes and decision records in the recruiting system. Continue to Make the decision. Share interview evidence through the organization's recruiting process. Compare observations with outcomes agreed in the role brief. Bring differences or unanswered questions to the hiring discussion. Make the decision Decide against role outcomes, not a general impression The hiring team discusses evidence; the recruiting process holds the authoritative decision record. Revisit agreed role outcomes, hear each interviewer's relevant observations, and distinguish evidence from inference. Surface gaps and differing interpretations before following your organization's recruiting-system process for the decision. The examples here show how to structure a discussion. They do not set an approval rule, scoring threshold, or hiring policy. Run a focused evidence discussion Revisit the role outcomes Use the agreed role brief as the shared reference for the discussion. Hear each interviewer's evidence Ask for observations tied to the interviewer's agreed focus. Separate evidence from inference Make clear what was observed and what the panel is interpreting. Name gaps or differences Discuss unanswered questions and differing interpretations against the role outcomes. Follow the recruiting process Use the organization's recruiting-system process for the decision and its authoritative record. Two different discussion situations A useful discussion connects evidence to the role, rather than relying on confidence or unanimity alone. Strong impression, little role evidence The panel describes a candidate as impressive but cannot identify observations related to the agreed outcomes. Ask which specific example supports the impression. Identify which role outcome, if any, it addresses. State what remains unanswered instead of treating confidence as evidence. Mixed evidence tied to an outcome One interviewer heard a clear explanation of a project trade-off; another did not hear how the person responded when priorities changed. Discuss both observations against the relevant role outcome. Keep the gap visible rather than averaging away the difference. Follow the recruiting process for the decision and record. After the decision: coordinate the handoff Use the approved recruiting process for the decision record and next actions. Continue to Hand over the hire. Confirm required recruiting-process steps with the assigned recruiting partner. Align the receiving manager and recruiting partner on appropriate next actions. Share role context through approved channels, not applicant notes copied into this site. Hand over the hire Coordinate the transition to the receiving manager This page covers the hiring-to-onboarding handoff, not onboarding or development guidance. Align the hiring manager, recruiting partner, and receiving manager on agreed next actions through approved channels. Share only role context appropriate for the transition. Applicant information and the authoritative decision record remain in the recruiting system. Ask the receiving manager which approved training and development resources support the new hire’s first assignments, and carry that ownership into the handoff. Make the handoff clear This is a coordination sequence, not an automated workflow or status tracker. Check the recruiting-process record The hiring manager and recruiting partner confirm the decision record and required next actions through the organization's recruiting process. Align the receiving manager Share agreed next steps and role context needed to prepare for the transition through approved channels. Keep applicant details in the right place Do not copy applicant notes or decision details into this playbook or an unrelated handoff reference. Move development guidance to its home Use the organization's Training & Development Hub for development resources instead of duplicating those materials here. Illustrative handoff reference Fictional example with no applicant details; not a task queue or system of record. Handoff topic Responsible role Keep in the recruiting system Decision record and recruiting-process next actions Hiring manager and recruiting partner Authoritative decision and applicant-specific records Role outcomes relevant to the receiving manager's preparation Hiring manager Any applicant-specific notes or interview evidence Agreed transition actions Receiving manager and recruiting partner Recruiting-process records and applicant information Development resources after the hiring handoff Receiving manager The hiring record remains in the recruiting system; development guidance belongs in the established training hub. Continue with the appropriate next resource Keep each authoritative resource in its own home. Applicant records and authoritative hiring decisions stay in the recruiting system. Return to the playbook's hiring stages when another hiring coordination task remains. Use the organization's established Training & Development Hub for onboarding and development guidance. Bring recruiting-process or record questions to the assigned recruiting partner.