Third-Party Security Review Preparation
Prepare a third-party security assessment request with clear notes on the business purpose, data, access, vendor evidence, and review handoff. The fictional scheduling-service example shows sponsors how to separate known facts from open questions.
Every employee gets a seat — priced per employee in Communications & Intranet, quoted with this template ready.
Rolled out to every employee at AutoZone (125,000), PetSmart (50,000+), A.S. Watson and Raley's (20,000) — and at larger retailers we are not permitted to name.
Built for: Technology and software · Healthcare administration · Financial services · Manufacturing and operations
Overview
Third-Party Security Review Preparation is a single-page guide for project sponsors assembling a vendor assessment request for IT and Security. It organizes the work into three preparation topics: the data a service will store or process, the people and systems that can access it, and the evidence the vendor can provide. A fictional Northstar Works scheduling pilot demonstrates how to describe a service's purpose, users, planned data, access, and unanswered questions without presenting assumptions as facts.
Use the page before submitting a request for a new third-party service, such as a pilot that handles employee information. Its vendor-evidence table covers a service-specific security overview, incident contacts, data location and processing, subprocessors, retention and deletion, and any shareable independent assessment reports. The handoff steps direct sponsors to gather replies, submit through the organization's approved route, and answer follow-up in the same request. A role comparison clarifies that sponsors prepare and coordinate, while designated reviewers assess evidence and decide next steps; procurement handles sourcing and contract terms separately.
This is preparation guidance, not a security approval, vendor scorecard, contract checklist, or substitute for your organization's intake process. It does not determine legal compliance or prescribe a review schedule. Do not use the fictional pilot details as organizational facts, assume a vendor's unanswered question has a favorable answer, or send sensitive details through chat, email threads, or page comments. Adapt the example to the service under review and route unresolved risks to the designated specialists.
Standards & compliance context
- This page supports preparation for a security and privacy assessment but does not certify compliance with laws, regulations, or internal requirements.
- Ask designated privacy and security reviewers to assess applicable obligations based on the actual data, service, and locations involved.
- Keep evidence and sensitive details within the organization's approved request route rather than chat, email threads, or page comments.
- When adapting the page, use accessible headings and readable tables, and check that the published page meets WCAG 2.1 AA expectations.
General regulatory context for orientation only — verify current requirements with counsel or the relevant agency before relying on this template for compliance.
What's inside this template
Prepare a vendor assessment that reviewers can act on the first time
This introduction defines the sponsor audience and the three categories of information to assemble before submitting a request.
-
For project sponsors bringing a new third-party service to IT and Security. The example below follows Northstar Works, a fictional organization piloting an outside scheduling service. Gather three things before you submit: what data the service will hold, who and what will have access, and what evidence the vendor can supply. Reviewers then spend their time assessing risk instead of chasing basics.
Three things to prepare
Use these topics to organize the service's data, access model, and available vendor evidence.
-
These are preparation topics, not separate approvals. Work through them in any order; together they make up your request. Data involved Describe what the service will store or process, and for whom. List each data type, such as work email or shift preferences Estimate how many people's data is included Note where data comes from and where it goes Write down what you do not yet know about retention Access model Say who and what will be able to reach the data. Name the user groups at your organization List integrations, such as sign-in or HR system connections Ask whether vendor staff can view customer data, and why State the pilot's start and end dates Vendor evidence Collect what the vendor already publishes or will share. Request the current security overview for this specific service Ask how the vendor notifies customers of an incident Note any conditions on sharing documents Record gaps as questions for the vendor, not assumptions
Worked example: a scheduling pilot at Northstar Works
The fictional pilot shows how to distinguish confirmed scope from questions that still need vendor answers.
-
A fictional sponsor's notes, written the way a reviewer needs to read them Business purpose. Two operations teams (about 150 people) will try an outside scheduling service for 90 days to replace shared spreadsheets. Data involved Employee name and work email, entered by team leads. Shift preferences and availability, entered by each employee. Not planned: home addresses, payroll data or health information. The sponsor will confirm this with the vendor in writing. Access model Employees sign in to view their own shifts; two team leads edit schedules. A vendor support role may access the account to troubleshoot. Question for the vendor: is that access logged, and can customers approve it each time? No integration with other systems during the pilot. Open questions, not assumptions What happens to schedule data when the pilot ends? Where is the data stored and processed? Notes like these let a reviewer see what is known, what is unknown and who owes the answer.
Vendor evidence to ask for
This table connects each evidence request to the review question it helps answer and an action for the sponsor.
-
Ask the vendor for each item and record their answer in their own words. Reviewers decide what the answers mean. Ask the vendor for Why reviewers ask Your action Security overview for this service Shows how the vendor describes its own controls Request the current version and note its date Incident contact process Shows how and when customers are told about an incident Record who contacts whom, by what channel, and the stated timeframe Data location and processing Lets reviewers compare handling against the data types you listed Ask which regions are used and whether support staff view data from elsewhere Subprocessors Identifies other companies that may touch your data Request the list and how customers are told of changes Retention and deletion Clarifies what remains after the pilot ends Ask what is kept, for how long, and how deletion is requested Independent assessment reports May give reviewers outside assurance, if the vendor has any Ask what can be shared and under what conditions
From preparation to review handoff
These steps take the sponsor from defining scope through submission and reviewer follow-up.
-
Specialists assess the material and decide next steps. Your part is to make their starting point complete. State the business purpose and scope One short paragraph: what the service does, which teams use it, and the pilot or contract dates. Describe data and access Use the example above as a pattern. List data types, who has access, integrations, and open questions. Gather the vendor's evidence Send the vendor the questions in the table. Keep their replies and note anything they decline to share. Submit through your organization's approved request route Attach the material there. Keep sensitive details out of chat, email threads and page comments. Answer reviewer follow-up Security, privacy and other designated reviewers may ask for clarification. Reply in the same request so the history stays in one place.
Who does what
This comparison separates sponsor preparation and coordination from specialist assessment and procurement work.
-
Keep these roles distinct so each question reaches the right person. Describe the business purpose Writes and owns it Reads and may ask questions Data and access details Provides what is known and flags gaps Checks them against approved requirements Vendor evidence Requests and attaches it Evaluates what it does and does not show Risk decision and conditions Responds to follow-up Security, privacy and other reviewers decide Sourcing and contract terms Coordinates with procurement Handled separately by procurement, not this review
Who to ask for help
Use these role-based contacts to direct review-process questions and sourcing questions to the appropriate function.
-
Ask about what a request needs, how reviewers will handle it and where it stands Security review owner IT and Security Ask about project dates, budget approvals and the separate sourcing and contract process Your project or procurement contact Project office or Procurement
How to use this template
- Replace the Northstar Works scenario with a concise description of your service, business purpose, user groups, and pilot or contract dates.
- List each data type, its source and destination, the people or vendor roles with access, any integrations, and what remains unknown.
- Request the evidence shown in the table from the vendor and record responses, document dates, sharing limits, and unanswered questions.
- Submit the gathered material through your organization's approved request route, keeping sensitive details out of chat, email threads, and page comments.
- Answer reviewer follow-up in the same request, then coordinate any sourcing or contract questions with the appropriate project or procurement contact.
Best practices
- Name each data type and its source or destination instead of describing the service's data use in broad terms.
- Separate confirmed facts from vendor questions, and label unknown retention, data-location, or support-access details explicitly.
- Describe access by role, including vendor support access, and ask whether it is logged and whether customer approval is available.
- Request evidence for the specific service under review and note the date or version of each document received.
- Record vendor responses in their own words and identify any sharing conditions or documents the vendor declines to provide.
- Keep the scope concrete by stating the teams, pilot dates, user groups, and integrations that are actually planned.
- Use the approved request route for sensitive materials and keep reviewer follow-up in that same request.
What this template typically catches
Issues teams running this template most often surface in practice:
Common use cases
Frequently asked questions
Who should use this preparation page?
It is for project sponsors bringing a new third-party service to IT and Security. The sponsor gathers the business purpose, data types, access model, vendor evidence, and unresolved questions. Specialist reviewers assess the material and decide next steps.
Does completing this page approve a vendor?
No. It prepares a request for review; it does not provide an approval, risk rating, or permission to use a service. Follow your organization's approved request route and wait for the designated reviewers' decision. Procurement and contract work remain separate.
When should a sponsor use this template?
Use it before submitting a new third-party service for assessment, especially when the service will handle organizational or employee data. Update the request if the proposed data, access, integrations, or pilot dates change. The page does not prescribe a recurring review cadence.
What evidence should we request from the vendor?
The page lists a service-specific security overview, incident contact process, data location and processing details, subprocessors, retention and deletion information, and any shareable independent assessment reports. Ask what is available and record the vendor's answer in its own words. Reviewers determine what the evidence demonstrates.
What if the vendor will not provide a document or does not know an answer?
Record the gap as an open question, including what was requested and what the vendor said. Do not treat missing information as proof that a control exists or does not exist. Let the specialist reviewers assess the gap and advise on next steps.
Does this template cover privacy laws or industry-specific requirements?
It prompts sponsors to describe data handling and gather evidence, but it does not determine legal compliance or replace privacy, security, or sector-specific review. Requirements depend on the data, service, location, and organization. Route those questions to the designated specialists.
How should we handle sensitive details when submitting?
Attach materials through your organization's approved request route. The page specifically advises keeping sensitive details out of chat, email threads, and page comments. Use the same request for reviewer follow-up so the history remains together.
Can we adapt the fictional scheduling pilot to another service?
Yes. Treat Northstar Works and its scheduling pilot as illustrative sample content, not facts about your organization. Replace the sample scenario with the proposed service's actual purpose, users, data, access, dates, and vendor answers. Keep unknowns clearly labeled rather than filling them with assumptions.
How is this different from sending reviewers an informal email?
The page organizes the request around business purpose, data, access, vendor evidence, open questions, and ownership. That gives reviewers a clearer starting point than a scattered email thread and helps sponsors see what remains unanswered. It does not replace your organization's approved intake system.
Related templates
Go deeper on the topic
-
A modern intranet is a specific surface — typically the home-base destination where employees get company news, find policies, and access key apps. A digital...
Ready to use this template?
Every employee gets a seat. Request pricing for Communications & Intranet and we quote into a workspace with Third-Party Security Review Preparation ready.
Rolled out to every employee at AutoZone (125,000), PetSmart (50,000+), A.S. Watson and Raley's (20,000) — and at larger retailers we are not permitted to name.