Prepare a clear design clarification request
For this fictional example, North Quay is a mixed-use construction project. Use the four-part structure below to help the authorized project team understand where the question applies, what is unclear, what options affect the work, and what decision is needed. This page is for design clarification—not IT support or general project escalation.
Choose the right kind of request
Start with the issue you need resolved.
Clarify a design reference
- Name the exact location and reference.
- Describe what you observed without guessing at intent.
Resolve a coordination choice
- State the options you can identify.
- Describe the work-coordination impact of each.
Route a different issue
- Do not use a design clarification request as a substitute for those routes.
- If unsure, ask the project or property operations owner which authorized route applies.
Build the request in four parts
Keep each part specific enough for someone who was not at the workface to understand.
-
1
Location and reference
Identify the building or area, level, grid or room where applicable, and the exact drawing, specification, schedule, or detail reference and revision available to you. -
2
Observed ambiguity
Describe what the reference shows and what is unclear or appears inconsistent. Separate what you observed from your interpretation. -
3
Options and impact
List the plausible options you can identify and the practical coordination impact of each, such as an interface, sequence, access, or rework consideration. Do not present an option as approved. -
4
Decision needed
Ask one direct question. State what needs to be confirmed or selected so the authorized design or project role can respond.
Worked example: ceiling service route at North Quay
Illustrative coordination example—not an approved design, instruction, or project record.
Location and reference
North Quay, Block B, Level 03, west corridor between grids 4–6. Architectural reflected ceiling plan A-231, revision C, and mechanical services plan M-118, revision B.
Observed ambiguity
At the west corridor crossing, the architectural plan shows a continuous ceiling zone. The mechanical plan appears to route a duct through the same zone as the ceiling service access panel. The references do not make the intended arrangement clear.
Options and impact
- Option A: Keep the duct route shown and shift the access panel within the ceiling zone. This may require the relevant design roles to confirm the panel remains coordinated with the affected services.
- Option B: Review an adjusted duct route at the crossing. This may affect coordination with adjacent services and the planned installation sequence.
Decision needed
Please confirm whether Option A is acceptable, or provide a coordinated alternative for the duct and access-panel arrangement at this location. Which reference or revised detail should the trade team use for coordination?
Keep the request focused on the ambiguity and coordination decision. Do not treat this example as project direction; follow the authorized project process and applicable approved information.
Handoff and help
Use the project’s authorized request route for submission. If the submission form is not available to you, or you are unsure which process applies, contact the project or property operations owner through the established project channel. That owner can clarify routing and the appropriate design or project role for the question.
Keep sensitive project information in the system authorized for it. For regulated, safety-critical, or otherwise sensitive matters, use the applicable approved local process and consult the responsible domain owner; this page does not establish policy or provide operational approval.