Effective 3 November 2026: shared priorities move to Enterprise Enablement
In this fictional Northstar Group example, Enterprise Enablement coordinates priority decisions for customer requests that affect more than one business. Each business team still decides and delivers its own work.
The change in one minute
For employees whose work or decisions cross business-team boundaries
This page uses a fictional cross-business organization to show how a responsibility change can work. It is an illustrative example, not a real company policy.
Changed: one team coordinates the shared priority decision when a customer request affects multiple businesses. Unchanged: each business team decides its delivery scope and sequence. Coordination does not transfer delivery accountability.
Before and after
The change is about who coordinates shared priority—not who delivers each team's work.
| Work or decision | Before 3 November | From 3 November |
|---|---|---|
| Prioritize a request affecting multiple businesses | Each business team prioritized its incoming requests independently. | Enterprise Enablement coordinates a shared priority recommendation with the affected teams. |
| Decide a business team's delivery scope | The business team decided its own scope. | The business team continues to decide its own scope. |
| Set a team's work sequence | The business team sequenced its own delivery work. | The business team continues to sequence its own delivery work. |
Responsibilities by role
Use the role that best matches the work you are doing.
Requesting teams
Enterprise Enablement
Business delivery teams
Worked handoff: one request, two business teams
Illustrative example: a fictional customer request affects Northstar's Business A and Business B.
-
1
Describe the shared outcome
The requesting team explains the customer need, the requested timing, and why both businesses are involved. -
2
Coordinate the priority discussion
Enterprise Enablement brings Business A and Business B together to compare impact, constraints, and the proposed shared priority. -
3
Confirm each delivery boundary
Each business team states what it can deliver, its scope, and its sequence. For example, Business A may be able to provide one data feed while Business B decides whether and when to use it. -
4
Clarify unresolved ownership
If the teams disagree about who owns a decision or handoff, the managers responsible for the affected teams clarify the boundary. Do not treat the shared priority recommendation as an automatic reassignment.
Which team owns this question?
Use the nature of the decision to find the right responsibility boundary.
A priority conflict across businesses
- Name the affected businesses.
- Describe the impact and requested timing.
A technical approach within one team's delivery
- State the team's proposed approach.
- Identify any dependency on another team.
A proposed change to the ownership boundary
- Ask the managers responsible for the affected teams to resolve unclear ownership.
Where to take an unresolved question
Unclear ownership between affected teams: ask the managers responsible for those teams to clarify who owns the decision or handoff.
Unclear wording or scope in the operating-model description: ask Business Operations to clarify the description. Business Operations owns this fictional operating-model description.
When raising the question, name the work, the decision that is unclear, and the teams involved. Keep delivery moving only within responsibilities the affected teams have confirmed.