Start with a defined integration need
This example uses the fictional Northstar Group. It contains no credentials and illustrates how to evaluate and discuss an API integration—not how to obtain access. An API may be a fit when a specific system-to-system need can be met through a documented interface and its approved access path. Use the responsible service or API owner to confirm applicability before building.
Check whether an API is a fit
These scenarios are decision aids, not approval rules.
A defined exchange may fit
- Name the business purpose and the fields needed.
- Identify the source and receiving systems.
- Ask the service owner whether the documented interface supports the need.
An undocumented bulk export is a poor fit
- Do not treat an API as permission to collect all available data.
- Clarify the purpose, scope, and data owner before proceeding.
- Ask about an approved alternative if the published interface does not fit.
Prepare an access request
This is the integrator's preparation sequence, not an approval or provisioning workflow.
Keep the request specific enough for the responsible owners to assess scope and fit.
-
1
Describe the purpose and data
State the work outcome, the data elements needed, the expected exchange pattern, and why each element is required. -
2
Identify the systems and environment
Name the source and receiving systems, their responsible owners, and the intended environment. Do not include secrets in a general request. -
3
Use the established review route
Submit the request through your organization's approved route and provide the context requested there. The relevant API or service owner can identify that route. -
4
Implement only against approved details
Use only the endpoint, authentication method, permissions, and interface schema approved for this integration. Owner-only administration and credential issuance remain with authorized roles.
Worked example: a request shape
Illustrative structure only; the endpoint, authentication, and schema are not real.
A Northstar integration proposal needs one record by identifier. The example below shows where request components commonly appear; it is not a callable endpoint and does not establish access.
GET /v1/records/<record-id> HTTP/1.1
Host: api.example.invalid
Accept: application/json
Authorization: Bearer <approved-token>An illustrative response body might have this shape:
{
"recordId": "<record-id>",
"status": "active",
"updatedAt": "2026-09-18T10:30:00Z"
}Replace the illustrative resource, fields, and authentication pattern only with details confirmed for the approved interface. Never put a real token, secret, or personal data in a shared example.
Request elements at a glance
All examples are illustrative labels, not a supported Northstar interface.
| Element | Illustrative example | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Method | GET | Describes the requested operation; use only methods documented for the interface. |
| Path | /v1/records/<record-id> | Identifies a resource and, in this example, one record. |
| Headers | Accept: application/json | Carries request metadata; follow the interface's published requirements. |
| Query parameters | ?updatedAfter=<timestamp> | Can narrow a collection request when the interface documents that parameter. |
| Body | {"recordId":"<record-id>"} | Carries data for methods and schemas that define a request body. |
Coordinate version and change questions
Before implementation or a change, check the interface's published version and change notes. Keep the integration aligned with the version its responsible owner supports; do not assume that a version label alone explains compatibility.
- Record the interface version and change note relevant to the integration.
- Ask the API or service owner which supported version and change process apply.
- Plan and test changes using the organization's approved process before changing a dependent integration.
- Raise unclear compatibility, retirement, or timing questions with the responsible owner rather than guessing.
Terms: an endpoint is a documented interface address; a schema describes the structure of request or response data; a breaking change requires a consumer adjustment to continue working as expected.