Write a nomination people can understand
A useful nomination names the contribution, gives enough context to understand it, and describes its effect. Keep the account accurate, specific, and connected to the selected program’s criteria.
Build the example
Use this sequence to make the contribution clear.
-
1
Identify the action
State what the colleague did in observable terms.
-
2
Add the context
Explain what the team or situation needed at the time.
-
3
Describe the effect
Say who or what the action helped, without overstating results.
-
4
Connect it to a program
Use the published criteria to decide whether the example fits.
Worked example: a clear handoff
“During a Tuesday case handoff, Jordan noticed that the next team could not tell which requests still needed follow-up. Jordan reorganized the notes into ‘complete’ and ‘next action’ sections and flagged the open items. The evening team could see where to start without repeating the review. This is a strong example of clear, practical peer support.”
Nomination questions
A few checks can help keep a nomination useful and fair.
What information should I include?
Describe the action, relevant context, and its effect. Include only details you can verify and that are appropriate to share.
How do I recognize a shared contribution?
Name the people or roles involved where appropriate, and explain each contribution rather than assigning all the work to one person.
What if I am unsure which program fits?
Compare the example with the program’s published criteria. If the criteria or nomination route are not available, ask the program owner before submitting.