Start with a defined integration need

This example uses the fictional Northstar Group. It contains no credentials and illustrates how to evaluate and discuss an API integration—not how to obtain access. An API may be a fit when a specific system-to-system need can be met through a documented interface and its approved access path. Use the responsible service or API owner to confirm applicability before building.

Check whether an API is a fit

These scenarios are decision aids, not approval rules.

A defined exchange may fit

A scheduling service needs a limited set of approved fields from a published interface at a defined interval.

  • Name the business purpose and the fields needed.
  • Identify the source and receiving systems.
  • Ask the service owner whether the documented interface supports the need.

An undocumented bulk export is a poor fit

A team proposes repeated broad extraction because it is easier than agreeing on a supported data exchange.

  • Do not treat an API as permission to collect all available data.
  • Clarify the purpose, scope, and data owner before proceeding.
  • Ask about an approved alternative if the published interface does not fit.

Prepare an access request

This is the integrator's preparation sequence, not an approval or provisioning workflow.

Keep the request specific enough for the responsible owners to assess scope and fit.

  1. 1

    Describe the purpose and data

    State the work outcome, the data elements needed, the expected exchange pattern, and why each element is required.

  2. 2

    Identify the systems and environment

    Name the source and receiving systems, their responsible owners, and the intended environment. Do not include secrets in a general request.

  3. 3

    Use the established review route

    Submit the request through your organization's approved route and provide the context requested there. The relevant API or service owner can identify that route.

  4. 4

    Implement only against approved details

    Use only the endpoint, authentication method, permissions, and interface schema approved for this integration. Owner-only administration and credential issuance remain with authorized roles.

Worked example: a request shape

Illustrative structure only; the endpoint, authentication, and schema are not real.

A Northstar integration proposal needs one record by identifier. The example below shows where request components commonly appear; it is not a callable endpoint and does not establish access.

GET /v1/records/<record-id> HTTP/1.1
Host: api.example.invalid
Accept: application/json
Authorization: Bearer <approved-token>

An illustrative response body might have this shape:

{
  "recordId": "<record-id>",
  "status": "active",
  "updatedAt": "2026-09-18T10:30:00Z"
}

Replace the illustrative resource, fields, and authentication pattern only with details confirmed for the approved interface. Never put a real token, secret, or personal data in a shared example.

Request elements at a glance

All examples are illustrative labels, not a supported Northstar interface.

Request elements at a glance
Element Illustrative example Purpose
Method GET Describes the requested operation; use only methods documented for the interface.
Path /v1/records/<record-id> Identifies a resource and, in this example, one record.
Headers Accept: application/json Carries request metadata; follow the interface's published requirements.
Query parameters ?updatedAfter=<timestamp> Can narrow a collection request when the interface documents that parameter.
Body {"recordId":"<record-id>"} Carries data for methods and schemas that define a request body.

Coordinate version and change questions

Before implementation or a change, check the interface's published version and change notes. Keep the integration aligned with the version its responsible owner supports; do not assume that a version label alone explains compatibility.

  1. Record the interface version and change note relevant to the integration.
  2. Ask the API or service owner which supported version and change process apply.
  3. Plan and test changes using the organization's approved process before changing a dependent integration.
  4. Raise unclear compatibility, retirement, or timing questions with the responsible owner rather than guessing.

Terms: an endpoint is a documented interface address; a schema describes the structure of request or response data; a breaking change requires a consumer adjustment to continue working as expected.

Route questions to the responsible role

API or service owner
Interface scope, published endpoint details, supported versions, and change notes
Department: Service ownership
Integration or platform support
Technical troubleshooting after the approved access and interface details are known
Department: Technical support
Relevant data owner
Whether the proposed data use and requested fields fit the stated business purpose
Department: Data ownership